Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Fr <br /> plfix€ORANDUM !� <br /> Page 3 i <br /> December 137 IM <br /> TOTAL COSTS AND POSSIBLE REVENUE <br /> (with 1979 as basis) <br /> Appeals and Special <br /> Zoning Variances Final Preliminary Minor Use <br /> Permits (Bd« o£ Ad'.) Rezonin s Plats Plats Subdivisions Permits. ._. <br /> Attorneys Review — - — 7 ? ? <br /> of ROW and Road <br /> Maintenance <br /> Agreement <br /> Attorneys Review ? <br /> of Security <br /> Instrument <br /> Legal Ads _ 20 20 — — <br /> Planning Staff 5 87 117 52 172 63 <br /> per case or <br /> subdivision <br /> Possible. 5 107 137 52 + ? 172 + ? 63 + ? <br /> Revenue per <br /> source <br /> Number Cases +600 2 3 7 6 107 0 <br /> or Subdivisions (69 lots) (fit lots) (182 lots) <br /> in 1979 <br /> Recommendation Number 3: if fees are to be charged, a flat fee should <br /> be charged each type of subdivisioA plat reviewed in addition to a charge per <br /> number of lots. The larger the number of lots per subdivision, the greater <br /> the length of review. <br /> Recommendation Number 4: If fees are to be charged, there should be <br /> a substantially lower flat fee for minor subdivisions as opposed to major <br /> subdivisions. <br /> In summation, if fees are to be charged, the equitable treatment of <br /> citizens per size and complexity of development proposals should be a primary- <br /> consideration. However, if imposed, fees can be equitably applied- <br /> Iss <br /> 1 . "�+W � w.�. s?.,.�.aL �;, � 'I.;r F� �. �"Y ?.d`n t�..�. ;„,��;t c,,,'7.r•��.,�'rty.'r�1�fsrf;�.�, . <br />