Browse
Search
Minutes 05-29-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 05-29-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2015 10:24:40 AM
Creation date
6/25/2015 10:22:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/29/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
RES-2012-050 Resolution appointing Paul Laughton as Interim Tax Administrator
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Planning Department received information from the State Floodplain Mapping Program <br /> that 10 of these properties contain floodplain. <br /> Information <br /> • Ten parcels containing 320 acres, <br /> • 20.7 acres of Floodplain <br /> • No structures involved <br /> Mark Marcoplos left at 10:13PM. <br /> Glenn Bowles said that an open house was held and the property owners that were <br /> affected were invited. No one attended, however. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Hemminger, seconded by Commissioner Yuhasz <br /> to refer this matter to the Planning Board asking for a recommendation to be returned to the <br /> Board of County Commissioners in time for the August 21, 2012 meeting and adjourn the public <br /> hearing until August 21, 2012 for final action. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 9. 7. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments - To review government- <br /> initiated amendments to the text of Article 3 of the UDO to revise various Dimensional and Ratio <br /> Standards in commercial and industrial zoning districts if the district is applied to property located <br /> in Commercial or Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Nodes, as depicted on the Future <br /> Land Use Map contained in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Planner Perdita Holtz made a PowerPoint presentation. <br /> Unified Development Ordinance <br /> Proposed Text Amendments <br /> (UDO/Zoning 2012-11) <br /> Task <br /> Propose amendments to the UDO that will allow for a greater intensity of property use in the <br /> Commercial and Commercial-Industrial Transition Activity Nodes. <br /> - Existing ratios developed for areas that are not served by public water <br /> and sewer systems and which are intended to remain rural. <br /> Proposal <br /> - This proposal is similar to the revisions made to the Economic <br /> Development (ED) zoning districts earlier this year and to the 0/1 district <br /> last year. <br /> - Proposed ratios and height limits for the zoning districts applicable to <br /> CTAN and CITAN areas are in keeping with similar ED zoning districts. <br /> ➢ Would allow for greater floor area (e.g., building with more square <br /> feet) and less "open space" in Nodes. <br /> - Other requirements of the UDO, including impervious surface limits, still <br /> apply. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.