Browse
Search
Minutes 05-29-2012
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 05-29-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2015 10:24:40 AM
Creation date
6/25/2015 10:22:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/29/2012
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 05-29-2012 - C7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 05-29-2012 - Budget Work Session
RES-2012-050 Resolution appointing Paul Laughton as Interim Tax Administrator
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O Mt. Herman looking north, Caddy Shack on east side, 1-85 Overpass in the distance <br /> O Mt. Herman looking south, 1-85 in background <br /> O Stonegate MHP off Mt. Herman with Industrial Warehouse use across road <br /> O dac Awnings opposite Stonegate MHP <br /> O Old Hillsborough Road looking east; Whispering Pines on north and some residential <br /> and undeveloped on South <br /> O Old Hwy 10 from Mt. Herman looking west <br /> O Old Hwy 10 from Mt. Herman looking east <br /> O High Power Transmission Substation off of US 70 <br /> Eno Neighborhood Meeting <br /> Citizen Comments <br /> 1. Stoney Creek Basin EDE-1 vs. EDE-2 <br /> The EDE-2 is suggested by staff because of the frontage along 1-85 and its <br /> relative isolation between the interstate, Mt. Herman Church Road, railroad <br /> tracks, and high voltage primary electric transmission lines. The opposite side <br /> (east) of the road is also presently EDE-2. Also to the east is Existing <br /> Commercial zoning (EC-5). <br /> 2. Resource Protection Areas (RPA) <br /> RPAs are a layer of the land use plan and are still operational in the Unified <br /> Development Ordinance (UDO) to protect environmental areas (i.e. stream buffers, <br /> steep slopes, etc.). <br /> 3. What is light industrial; compare Orange County and Durham County? <br /> The uses were discussed during the Eno EDD SAP meetings and comparability was <br /> achieved. Uses are not of the higher impact industrial. List of specific uses were <br /> added to webpage. <br /> 4. Why now public utilities? <br /> This area has been noted as an urban growth land use since 1981 and reconfirmed <br /> in 1994 and 2008. Recommendations in the Eno Small Area Plan suggested an <br /> agreement with the City of Durham which was accomplished in January 2012. <br /> Orange County is facilitating the proposed land use pattern since any one small or <br /> large business could not afford to build infrastructure. Job growth is more important <br /> than ever in designated areas. 84% of the county is rural and only 16% including <br /> cities and along interstates is designated as Urban. <br /> 5. Annexation <br /> These land use and zoning amendments do not create annexation programs. If a <br /> new business or resident wants public water and sewer, they will sign a voluntary <br /> annexation form and if the City of Durham decides the petition meets state law and is <br /> fiscally feasible then it may be annexed. (See annexation monograph from City of <br /> Durham) <br /> 6. Why are there two plans Orange County and City of Durham? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.