Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b1b - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 (c) As to the adequacy of evidence on unifzed control and the suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, deed restrictions, sureties, dedications, contributions, guarantees, or other instruments, or the need for such instruments, or for amendments in those proposed; For purposes of the SUP application, staff makes the following findings with regard to the request: i. That the rezoning and SUP application contains sufficient documentation indicating that the development will be under unified control guaranteeing the development of the property consistent with the proposed rezoning and SUP application. On making an affirmative finding, with respect to these three (3) requirements, staff relied on the following information: a. The Bucl~liorn Village Economic Development Planned Development application, prepared by Summit Consulting and Scott T. Murray Incorporated, outlining the nature of the project, b. The sworn testimony, as outlined within the minutes of the QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARINGS, dated February 25, 2008 and April 1, 2008 of: i. The applicants, namely: Rosemary Waldorf, Roger Perry, and George Horton ii. The consultants, namely: 1. Swnmit Consulting Firm (Jim Parker, Tracy Parrott) 2. Scott T. Murray Incorporated (Scott Murray) 3. Gel Group -Environmental Consultants (Bob Miller) 4. Arcadis -Traffic Engineering Firm (Tyson Graves) iii. Planning staff, iv. The Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Board, and v. Members of the general public, c. The applicant's response to questions asked during the PUBLIC HEAIEZINGS dated March 19, 2008 and April 30, 2008, d. The Orange County Zoning Ordinance, e. The Orange County Economic Development Design Manual, and f. The Orange County Comprehensive Plan. Please refer to the information outlined under Section I Rezoning for a detailed breakdown of the various Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan sections utilized in making the our recommendation. SECTION 7.5.4 (d) and (e): The remaining required findings contained within Section 7.5.4 are as follows: (d) As to the suitability of plans proposed or the desirability of amendments;