Browse
Search
Minutes 03-15-2012 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Minutes 03-15-2012 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2015 3:17:41 PM
Creation date
6/22/2015 3:15:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/15/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-15-2012 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 03-15-2012 - Work Session
Agenda - 03-15-2012 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 03-15-2012 - Work Session
Agenda - 03-15-2012 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 03-15-2012 - Work Session
Agenda - 03-15-2012 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2012\Agenda - 03-15-2012 - Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Stock said that the Sportsplex has been growing at about 700 members a year. <br /> He said that there is about a three-year payback in extra revenue for making these major <br /> investments. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs requested that the County Commissioners be able to do a tour <br /> of the Sportsplex. <br /> School Funding <br /> Paul Laughton made reference to the information from the Chair and Vice-Chair of <br /> OCS about Cedar Ridge projects and Elementary #8. <br /> Elementary #8 is not in the recommended CIP for funding. The auditorium for Cedar <br /> Ridge is in the CIP and the classroom wing addition is scheduled for year four. <br /> Chair Pelissier suggested that this be discussed at the joint meeting with the schools. <br /> Paul Laughton said that the appendices have the debt service and debt capacity. <br /> Pages 92-93 list the schools' unfunded projects. <br /> Active County Projects <br /> These projects were as of January 31, 2012. This is on pages 94-95. Page 96 has <br /> what was done in this year's CIP. He said that staff would like to receive direction on where to <br /> go from here. April 19th is the next work session and there is an hour set aside for this issue. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that last time this was discussed, the Board did provide some <br /> direction and she does not think any additional direction can be provided until there are budget <br /> drivers and the big picture. She does not see how the Board can provide any additional <br /> feedback until this information comes forward. <br /> Clarence Grier suggested sending questions via email. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that he would like to discuss the Emergency Services <br /> capital improvements. He will email his specific questions. <br /> 3. Orange County Transit Plan <br /> Chair Pelissier made reference to the cost-sharing with Durham. She said that several <br /> Orange County Commissioners have met informally with Durham County. She made <br /> reference to the timeline and said that it is expected that there will be a cost-sharing MOU or <br /> agreement by May 1St. In order to go to the public on April 3,d and April 17th, there has to be a <br /> financial plan in general to present to the public, along with the actual plan of services that <br /> would be received based on the 1/2-cent sales tax. The County Commissioners need to <br /> express whether they concur or not by the next meeting. The entities have discussed having a <br /> cost-sharing that is fair and simple to explain. <br /> Craig Benedict said that there is a big pie and the pie is made up of the revenue from <br /> the '/2-cent sales tax, a $7 additional Orange County vehicle registration fee, a $3 registration <br /> fee that Triangle Transit can impose, and other revenue. The largest portion will likely be <br /> spent on light rail, which is a shared project between Durham and Orange Counties. The <br /> County Commissioners have approved the locally preferred alternative, which fixed the end <br /> points (UNC and Alston Avenue). This is roughly a 17-mile length. The conceptual corridor <br /> was also approved. <br /> Attachment 2 shows five different options. The discussion ended last spring when <br /> Durham was interested in proceeding with a referendum. Durham County's plan would have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.