Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
F. s <br /> Orange County Planning Board members, and <br /> Orange County planning Department Staff <br /> page 2 <br /> Dacember 301 1981 <br /> given below The TjTvtbers <br /> approval t Mobile <br /> for the subdivision as <br /> i <br /> xne applicant request <br /> prefer for re g val with stipulations,. <br /> presented, but if that is not possible then app ro <br /> SPECIFIC RESPONSE TO THE STAFF'S SEVEN REAS014S <br /> 1. Concerning noise and buffers: <br /> ---The staff is incorrect on noise being a problem. The Adevelop ent will <br /> have no noise impact on <br /> the surrounding community. <br /> that the noise from the surroundings will adversely affect the site <br /> is untrue, and is contrary to the evidence presented in the Public <br /> Nearing. <br /> --The site has good buf€eying to the outside, due <br /> owner spoke ingfavoroof <br /> and the interstates. An adjoining property <br /> the development at the Public Hearing. <br /> ---The proposed recreation area provides buffering from 1-85. <br /> --The west border of the property borders on what will be an access <br /> directly on 1-4b. What particular access ramp will <br /> ramp rather than <br /> probably be one of the lesser used ones. our experience with other <br /> sites where 1-4o is crossing is that the paved roadway is 130 feet <br /> inside of the right-of-way line. <br /> 2. Concerning spacing and screening between units: <br /> ---The staff is incorrect on the average spacing being 18 feet. The <br /> minimum spacing between units is is feet, and that occurs between 13 <br /> For the <br /> of the proposed units (those along the south side) iun s is <br /> rest of the units (65 of them) the averag e spacing between <br /> 26 feet. <br /> --Evidence presented at the Puband Hearing <br /> lowexhren ai mobile <br /> rat sme residents <br /> do not expect much privacy, p <br /> -Tparlt,is a the ratesrthevresidentstmust pay;efor the hfollowing reasons: <br /> -The costs of the development are constant_ (The same amount of land <br /> is involved, and the same length of roads and water and sewer would <br /> be built, even though the mobile homes vyould be located less fre- <br /> quently along them_) <br /> Id result in less mobile home spaces being <br /> --Increasing the spacing wou <br /> provided. <br /> -The fewer number of units would have to bear the payoff Of the cost <br /> of all the improvements for the proposed number of units, <br /> -if the spacing were increased, the effect on the monthly rent would <br /> be as follows: <br /> 16 <br />