Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-19-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 01-19-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 10:13:24 AM
Creation date
6/19/2015 9:48:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/19/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820119
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ ♦r <br /> PROPERTY OF PAUL d, KEMPA <br /> T} p?.r'',-�-�:.nt: _ PL.INNI G PtL713.0 [_c"l ".I- - ]7c"'a }{�,,.X't".� <br /> CIIECKLIST, TAX FLAP, Trr$O ss i l.Q;i. C17�ic. -_ RICK CANTd2TY r..EbDTE KTR <br /> PLAN- <br /> vnona- 3k'L--+a x= 732-6161 <br /> PURPOSE. To consider approval of the Preliminary Plan for the Property of <br /> Paul J. Kempa <br /> Imo: Property is located in Cedar Grove Township on State Road 1545 <br /> (Saw flill Road). Both lots are proposed-to have 30 feet of <br /> frontage-9n the: paved state road. The proposed,-lat sizes of <br /> 5+ acres meet the miniLium standards of the Subdivision Regulations. <br /> This tract is designated Agricultural Residential in the Land <br /> Use Plan„ This tract is a division of one l0+ acre lot from <br /> a previously divided tract of land which contained 115x- acres. <br /> This 115 acres was divided into 10 tracts each larger than 10 <br /> acres. These tracts are served by a private road that did not <br /> have to be built to Orange County Standards. <br /> z <br /> WACT: This 'property is located in a rural section of 'Cedar Grove <br /> Toimship and contains large lots. <br /> The project lies outside of water supply water sheds- <br /> There should be minimal adverse impacts from this development. <br /> °SCO?I`JrND TION: Planning Staff recommends approval. <br /> Planning Board reconvends approval (3--5-a2), 6 infavor, Rizer <br /> opposed, Harris abstained., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.