Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-4v
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-4v
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:59:02 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:22:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4v
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~4 <br />In general, bans are sometimes the Least effective and mast onerous means of saving landfill <br />space. Staff suggests that if the Board were to consider additional bans, that it consider bann?ng <br />a limited number of items, and that it do so only after an in-depth community discussion about <br />the utility of farther bans. The community overall has had a negative experience lately with bans <br />and additional bans may create more of adversarial relationships around solid waste issues in <br />Orange County. <br />Extending to the residential sector enforcement of the existing ban for corrugated cardboard and <br />adding a ban on cathode ray tubes (CRTs) maybe worth further investigation and consideration. <br />They are the easiest to enforce, least likely to meet strong public resistance, provide for a <br />reasonable implementation timeframe and strong, low cost and readily available recycling . <br />options exist for these items. • <br />Adding rigid plastics to convenience centers and drop-off sites would fit within the current <br />overall departmental operational and financial structure and can be implemented in a time frame <br />to extend landfill life those few critical months projected as necessary to bridge the gap from ' <br />landfill closure date to transfer station opening. <br />Efforts being undertaken by the Solid Waste Plan Work Group on commercial waste, <br />franchising, rural waste collection, financing and an overall integrated plan have a much longer <br />planning horizon, are more complex and potentially more effective in the big picture of meeting <br />County solid waste goals. Staff recognizes the Board's concern that the new transfer station <br />siting process may require more immediate steps. Considering the resources required to plan <br />and implement the program augmentations and expansions described in this report, it is not <br />possible to implement all options, and staff believe that the effort to save landfill space is most <br />likely to be successful by focusing on two ar three top priorities. <br />While these highlighted measures are not necessarily, the largest space savers, staff is reasonably <br />sure of their utility, acceptance from residents, based on public feedback and our ability to <br />implement them effectively in the short time allotted, as they build on current program.' <br />infrastructure, existing markets and internal financing structures. <br />Based on direction .from the Board, staff could proceed with additional review, planning and <br />implementation of the programmatic recommendations and could present an agenda item for <br />BOCC consideration at an upcoming • BOCC meeting. Where funding is required' beyond <br />existing approved FY 2007/08 budget capabilities, staff would return to the BOCC for necessary <br />authorization. The CRT ban, if pursued by the County, would require an ordinance amendment <br />following established protocols. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.