Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-21-2013 - 4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2013
>
Agenda - 11-21-2013 - Assembly of Governments
>
Agenda - 11-21-2013 - 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2015 2:56:11 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 1:51:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-21-2013
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
56 <br /> I The $900,000 that Chapel MII, Carrboro, and Orange County agreed to pay to the <br /> Landfill Fund for the 100+acres of the Greene Tract that were not conveyed to Orange County <br /> cannot be used to pay for-either the construction of a community center or the extension of sewer <br /> lines to the Rogers Road area_ The Green Tract was acquired using landfill funds, and the <br /> $900,000 is being paid back to this enterprise fund. Such funds can only be expended to cover <br /> the costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the landfill. <br /> 4. Proceeds from the sale of the 100+ acre portion of the Greene Tract now owned <br /> jointly by OC, CB, and CH can be used in the same manner as other unrestricted general funds. <br /> Thus, Carrboro could use.these funds to extend sewer lines to unserved areas within Carrboro's <br /> corporate limits. <br /> S. The towns and the county could appropriate funds to subsidize the cost of actually <br /> connecting homes to a sewer line, once.that line has been constructed. In order to be able to <br /> point to specific statutory authority to provide such subsidies,it would be preferable to Iimit the <br /> availability of such subsidies to low and moderate income property owners. The attorn eys do not <br /> recommend that the contractor engaged by the county and/or the towns to extend the lines be <br /> directed to construct lines connecting individual properties to the public lines because this work <br /> involves actually getting into the plumbing systems within individual homes' and poses <br /> significant risks of unexpected complications and claims of damages. <br /> 6. The managers propose that a"County Sewer District"be created for the Rogers Road <br /> area as well as. adjoining areas that do not have sewer, and that the district use the special <br /> assessment process to recoup some of the costs of extending sewer service to these areas_ <br /> Presumably, the proposal is referring to a County Water and Sewer District created pursuant to <br /> Article 6 of CT.S. Chapter 162A. Such a district would be a legally separate municipal <br /> corporation, but the governing body of the district would be the Orange County Board of <br /> Commissioners. Such a district could issue its own bonds to raise the capital to cover the cost of <br /> extending the lines. Assessments could be based on various criteria listed in G.S. 153A-186„ <br /> including "the area of land served...at an equal rate per unit of area," which would mean that <br /> Properties with greater development or redevelopment potential would pay more than.smaller <br /> properties, but the statute does not provide a way to exempt from the assessments specific <br /> properties based on criteria not listed in the statute. Thus,if the objective is to extend sewer lines <br /> at little or no cost to the longstanding owners of properties in the Rogers Road area, but to <br /> recapture some of the cost of extending the lines when properties in this area are developed or <br /> redeveloped,the special assessment process appears to be a useful tool. <br /> An alternative might be to establish.the District and have the District issue its bonds to <br /> raise the cost of extending the lines. Carrboro could contract with the District to pay for the cost <br /> of extending the lines to serve properties that are within the town. The District would contract <br /> with OWASA to operate and maintain the lines and to bill the customers in the same manner as <br /> other OWASA customers. (An amendment to the WSNIPBA would probably be needed). Then <br /> the District could establish a fee—call it a service line extension fee—that would be designed to <br /> recoup some of the costs incurred by the District in extending the lines. (OWASA has an <br /> "availability fee"that is designed to recoup the cost of the treatment plant and major outfalls,but <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.