Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2008-e2f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 05-20-2008
>
Agenda - 05-20-2008-e2f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:42:02 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:19:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
e2f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080520 - Transfer Station
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordon said that Commissioner Nelson brought up rail access as a <br />criteria last time and it is included as a footnote in the technical criteria. Ed Schuffler said <br />that Commissioner Nelson had mentioned adding railway as exclusionary criteria, and the <br />consultants were concemed that if this is done, then it just gives athree-mile radius on <br />either side of the railroad and excludes a lot of the space. He thinks that the intentions of <br />Commissioner Nelson were to rank sites higher that had rail access nearby. He asked if <br />the Board wanted to leave this in technical criteria, or make it an exclusionary criterion. <br />Chair Jacobs said to flag rail access along with item B, access to major <br />transportation routes on the technical criteria. <br />4. Public Comment Period <br />Neloa Jones distributed a handout. She said that she finds it fascinating that there <br />was any discussion of excluding any sites very early in~the process before developing all <br />of the criteria, such as community-specific criteria. She said.that every manual suggests <br />developing all criteria fast and then applying it. She said that she read the resolution and <br />it suggests that the public will participate. in a meaningful manner in this process. She <br />wants to know how the resolution will ensure that Orange County residents and <br />representatives from civic groups will indeed meaningfully participate in this arduous <br />process that is already going very badly. <br />5. Adoption of Proposed Resolution on Public Participation tamended per Feb <br />,) ,~ th <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Foushee, seconded by <br />Commissioner Carey to adopt the Orange County Transfer Station Siting <br />Process Resolution Commitment to Public Participation. <br />Chair Jacobs read the resolution. <br />Orange County Transfer Station Siting Process Resolution <br />Commitment to Public Participation <br />WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners authorized County management to begin <br />planning a solid waste transfer station for the Eubanks Road site in March 2007; and <br />WHEREAS, the hoard agreed in November 2007, to activate a process for <br />identifying and evaluating alternate sites for locating a solid waste transfer station; and <br />WHEREAS, the services of Olver, Inc., an independent engineering consulting <br />firm, were engaged in December 2007 to guide grid assist the Board -serving as a <br />"committee of the whole"- through the technical phases of a search process -from <br />defining site criteria to the ranking of candidate sites -leading ultimately to a site <br />selection; and <br />WHEREAS, the Board is aware and appreciates the sense of urgency and <br />magnitude of effort required by this undertaking -given the existing landfill is projected to <br />be at capacity by 2011; and <br />WHEREAS, the Board is keenly concerned and committed to conducting a <br />process that provides for a high level of public information and abundant opportunity for <br />meaningful public participation throughout; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.