Agenda - 05-20-2008-e2f - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7 1 From: Orange County Human Relations Commission (HRC) 2 Re: Environmental Justice in the Transfer Station Siting Process 3 Meeting: Work Session, 4/15/2008, 5:30 PM, Southern Human Services Center 4 5 The following items were unanimously adopted by the HRC at the April 14, 2008 monthly 6 meeting. 7 8 Definition of Environmental Justice: 9 The fair treatrnent and meaningful involvement of people of all races, cultures, incomes and 10 educational levels with respect to the development and enforcement of environmental laws, 1l regulations, policies, and decisions. Fair treatment means that no group of people should bear a 12 disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial, i3 governmental and.commercial operations or policies. 14 15 Making EnvironmentallyDust Decisions: 16 The BOCC should ask the following questions about each decision it makes: 17 1. What are the environmental justice implications of this decision? 18 2. If this decision has environmental justice implications, have all Orange County residents 19, been given adequate notice of the issue, relevant information, and opportunities to give 20 meaningful input before the final decision is made? 21 3. Does a proposed solution have a potentially cumulative environmental impact on a 22 specific community or neighborhood? 23 4. If a proposed solution may be environmentally unjust, is there an alternative resolution 24 that would have a less disparate impact while still accomplishing our core purpose? 25 26 Sitina Criteria: Due to social justice considerations, the HRC voted to support the highest 27 possible weighting against the following siting criteria: 28 29 Technical Criteria: 30 Zoning Designations and Requirements -Overburdening or clustering of industrial 31 facilities adjacent to low income or minority areas. 32 33 Community-Specific Criteria: 34 • Environmental Justice Considerations . 35 • Proximity to Schools, Churches, Recreation Sites, and Residences 36 • Adjacent Land Uses 37 • Impact on Non-Protected Neighborhood Character 38 39 40 Commissioner Nelson asked what was meant by "impact on non-protected neighborhood 41 character." Bob Sallach said that they want to make sure that the character of existing 42 neighborhoods is not significantly impacted. 43 Commissioner Nelson asked how this would be applied in a justice sense, since anyone 44 can say that their neighborhood has a specific character, and anyone will be able to argue that 45 siting any facility next to their neighborhood is going to harm the character of their 46 neighborhood. He does not understand how this gets applied. 47 Shoshannah Smith said that an example would be a historically Latino and Hispanic 48 community, and putting this facility in the middle of that neighborhood would ghettoize or 49 disperse the population. 50 Commissioner Nelson said that this item is too abstract for it to be of real use.