Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />• Cultural & Historic Resources <br />• Public Parklands <br />• Natural Resources <br />• Energy Use <br />• Traffic <br />• Utilities <br />• Air Quality <br />• Water Quality <br />• Land Use <br />• Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities <br />• Visual & Aesthetic <br />• Minority & Low - Income Population Impacts <br />• Neighborhoods <br />• Business & Residential Impacts <br />• Population Served <br />• Employment Served <br />• Construction Impacts <br />Five Key Decisions <br />• Build or No Build <br />• Little Creek Crossing <br />• Duke /VA Station Location Choice <br />• Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Site <br />• New Hope Creek Crossing <br />To Build or Not to Build <br />• Build <br />• No Build <br />Little Creek: C1 Eliminated <br />• US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) provided a letter stating that C1A, C2, and <br />C2A were viable alternatives but that C1 was not. <br />• USACOE would not authorize use of federal government property (game lands and a <br />waterfowl impoundment) for C1 "given the availability of less damaging alternatives." <br />Little Creek: Travel Time <br />• C2 time 56 seconds shorter than C1A <br />• C2A time 10 seconds shorter than C2 <br />Little Creek: Ridership <br />• Lowest ridership alternative: C1A, NHC2, Duke Eye Care Center Station with 23,560 <br />daily riders <br />• C2 and C2A both add over 700 daily riders compared to C1A <br />Little Creek: Capital Cost <br />• Lowest capital cost alternative: C2, NHC -LPA, either Duke /VA station at $1.522 billion <br />• C2A adds $7.6m in capital cost <br />