Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
TOPIC <br />'Zoning Desigriatioris and Requiremenksi <br />Limit sltNg:.optlons <br />overburden'or clustering of industrial type' <br />~I, ,,, y ~ facilities adjacent to low income or <br />y E tt '~k' mmor'ity, areas <br />~_ °~'~ ~ ~ Garbon`Footiprint <br />s Greenhouse. gas emissions <br />t? Directly related to vehicle tulles traveled. <br />,,~,• ;k collection 'vehicle's and transfer-tratler•s' <br />'~~°^ Automobile =.:1 Ib CD?Jm,le ii riven <br />~,- <br /> -~ ;~; <br />~ . <br />r( <br />~ ~ <br /> ,~ <br />a ~ <br />a o <br />`~ !1 ~ L <br />F ` <br /> `G` <br />I x f~~.,.t <br /> <br />.x <br />f.X <br />i <br />': i~ <br />,F ~ f ' <br />Fi, 5 's <br />;Yi <br />S <br />.f l l <br />r <br />~! <br /> <br />A i <br /> <br />z,; <br />j <br />f <br />' <br />, <br /> <br /> <br /> r.~. t. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />f~ 1 i <br />hrlbF..i. yr r~. ,.ef. <br />~~ ~. k <br />p" ......_ p , <br />t~ 1~ iTLi r~ m <br />r:.«:...a.ts sr+~.r,..~s <br />.~. ......~...M.,..m. <br />Conerai Loq <br />tiorrro Celledton Routor-: <br />_ <br />JeeCess ro'NajarTranspartation Routes <br />Site Shc'.RequGem-ets, <br />Setticient Space for DerSita Roadways;;, <br />t,,UeuinR,'aad~Patkiny: <br /> <br />~'1'evdeatid 7raffic~CCmpaNMTity ~ ~ ~. <br />E:ietl erlterYa w'il R,a <br />xankedas lmpartant <br />or Very~Importani. <br />jtbility for ExPam+fon ' ' ~ ~ proposod wetgbting <br />Spaoa fai;Rdryktln&'Soiupoptlm}and <br />pubboEEutation~ bcrord aro ac follows:., <br /> <br />Bufhr:Spdce ~~ ,Ympartant~ 'S' <br />S/oryItnporta ,E .:1.0. <br />Geritiy Slop,ttg Topor~ra{i,ty <br />Ateos4'tn, uNlitiac <br />Zoning Des)enation^. grid Raquiremonto <br />Carbon Footprint Impact' <br />COMMENT <br />Carbon footprint should be included under central location <br />to collection route criteria. <br />Consideration of selecting site location based upon <br />optimization of air pollution versus distances/location. <br />"Carbon footprint impact would be assessed with respect to <br />potential increase associated with the distance from the <br />waste generation centroid." <br />First flue criteria -very important. Next two (Ability for <br />Expansion, and Space for Recycling, Composting...) - <br />important. Buffer space -very important. Last three <br />criteria -important. Move carbon footprint impact to <br />central location to collection routes criteria. 5 and 10 scale <br />weighting factors are OK. <br />"Example evaluation only -provided as a separate <br />handout." <br />"No carry over ranking or points from technical evaluation <br />to community-specific evaluation." <br />0 c~ea «, ,oo~i, wed wpb 14 <br />