Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-16-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 06-16-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2016 9:32:50 AM
Creation date
5/21/2015 10:43:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/16/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
potential for data transmission service, live remote <br />transmissions and other expanding opportunities that will <br />arise from technological advances. <br />Another major inequity in the proposal is that Alert <br />would not be required to make the kind of construction and <br />service commitment to the County that was required under <br />the Carolina Cable franchise. That franchise required <br />construction of 160 miles of cable in 18 months. The <br />Alert franchise proposal has only one small 7.2 mile area <br />of required construction. The only way that the two <br />companies' obligations can be regarded as comparable, let <br />alone equal, is to require that Alert be required to build <br />a significant distribution network throughout the county <br />(an initial build of "trunk" cable sufficient to serve all <br />areas of the county) and that Alert then have the same <br />obligations to extend service that Carolina Cable has <br />under its franchise. The most recent draft prepared by <br />the County Attorney has eliminated any meaningful obliga- <br />tion that Alert construct a competing system in the county <br />by giving them a six year period to construct even the <br />most basic trunk lines for such a system. This provision <br />is essentially an admission by the County that it does not <br />intend to require Alert to provide county -wide service, <br />but will simply allow it to expand its existing system <br />into the county whenever it chooses. <br />Alert proposes to make only extensions from its <br />existing plant that meet the density requirements and are <br />=99M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.