Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
(1) If he Complies with the provisions of the ordinance, the roo- <br />t i_ <br />rrty owner can secure no reasonable return from or make no reasonable <br />use of, his property. (It is not sufficient that failure to n"a <br />variance simply makes the property less valuable), nt the <br />"17'Svy •TG' 4)42 <br />Staff comment: <br />Based upon the following FINDINGS OF FACT, the Board concludes that the <br />applicant can /cannot secure a reasonable return from or make reasonable <br />use of his property in the absence of a variance: <br />(2) The hardshi of trhich the applicant complains results from u- <br />ni ue circumstances related to the a licant's land. (Note: hardships <br />suffered by the applicant in common with his neighbors does not justify) <br />a variance. Also, unique personal or family hardships are irrelevant <br />since a variance. if granted, runs with the land.) �yit9nlyi+�� Sr rs <br />Ae04rC oc 4A" adT L- <br />Staff comment: Mcl �v vs so wE r�� �.vra..a,...,�C <br />Based upon the following FINDINGS OF FACT, the Board concludes that the <br />hardship of which the applicant complains does /does not result from u- <br />nique circumstances related to the applicant's land: <br />(3) The hardsh�a <br />Staff comment: <br />Based upon the followi . <br />hardship is /is not the <br />is not the result of the a licant's own actions. <br />Re -C, M4 17 <br />ag FINDINGS OF FACT, the Board concludes that the <br />result of the applicant's own actions: <br />(b) THE VARIANCE IS IN HARMONY WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND IN7,'ENT OF <br />THE ORDINANCE A.ND PRESERVES ITS SPIRIT. (State facts and arguments to <br />show that the variance reqaested represents the least possible deviation <br />from the letter of the ordinance that will allow a reasonable use of the <br />land and that the use of the property, if the variance is granted, will <br />not substantially detract from the character of the neighborhood.) <br />/F 5 +/r0� Tim at�xa 8G srST�7iT Zrww& av T� <br />G� rs fiPerosm /s sS E Gov av Errs Zo•�ciG <br />S taff comment: . <br />Based upon the following FINDINGS OF FACT, the Board concludes that the <br />requested variance is /is not in harmony with the general purpose and in- <br />tent of the ordinance and does /does not preserve its spirit: <br />(c) THE GRANTING OF THE VARIANCE SECURES THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND 14ELFARE <br />AND DOES SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE. (State facts and arguments to show that, <br />on balance, if the variance is denied, the benefit to.the public will be <br />