Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-16-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 06-16-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2016 9:32:50 AM
Creation date
5/21/2015 10:43:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/16/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Planning Board Minutes <br />May 18, 1987 <br />1 �9 <br />e. Richie's Woods - Preliminary Plat <br />(Little River Township) <br />Presentation by Kirk. <br />The property in question is located in Little River <br />Township on Kim's Drive, a private Class B road leading <br />to Pearson Road (SR 1544). The developer is proposing <br />to divide a 10.72 acre tract. creating one new lot. <br />The property is not zoned and designated Agricultural <br />Residential in the Land Use Plan. All applicable <br />agencies have reviewed and commented on the <br />application. <br />Approval of the Preliminary Plan subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />1. Provision of a landscape plan demonstrating <br />compliance with Section IV -B -8 of the Subdivision <br />Regulations, including location of existing trees, <br />land use buffers and areas to be planted. <br />2. Payment -in -lieu of dedication of recreation /open <br />space in the amount of $729. <br />To adhere to time limits in the Subdivision Ordinance <br />the Planning Board must act on this by June 19, 1987. <br />Kirk stated that the payment -in -lieu was not applicable <br />as this project is not in the Joint Planning Area. <br />Jacobs asked how many lots had access to the private <br />road. Kirk responded seven other lots. Jacobs con- <br />tinued that if the adjoining lots in question did have <br />access, the road would have to be upgraded to a public <br />road. <br />Kirk informed the Board that the lots were originally <br />platted at over ten acre lots; thus, the road would not <br />meet the density requirement of NCDOT for a state <br />maintained road. Jacobs responded that the County <br />Attorney had indicated that the County could accept a <br />road as public without accepting maintenance obliga- <br />tions. <br />Collins reminded the Board that criteria is in place <br />for private roads and clarification is needed in order <br />for Staff to accurately inform the public. <br />Tom Fisler, developer of the subdivision, indicated <br />that the two adjoining lots do not have access to the <br />private road according to the Road Maintenance Agree- <br />ment. <br />Eddleman noted that the private road criteria should be <br />addressed in the documentation for the subdivision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.