Browse
Search
Minutes 04-09-2015
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Minutes 04-09-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:59:00 PM
Creation date
5/20/2015 8:06:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/9/2015
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-09-2015 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 04-09-2015 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-09-2015 - 1 & 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 04-09-2015 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-09-2015 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 04-09-2015 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-09-2015 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 04-09-2015 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair McKee said the Community Center being constructed on this property may cause <br /> the priority of this park work to move up. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he agreed. He asked if the relationship with OWASA has <br /> changed. He asked if the County may be able to take over recreation at Cane Creek or if it is <br /> possible that more land will become available. <br /> David Stancil said yes there has been some change. He said the recreation facility at <br /> Cane Creek is still a possibility and may offset some costs at Bingham Park. He said OWASA <br /> did a report on sludge and stated intention to pull back but the Board of Directors seems to <br /> have stopped short of doing so; therefore, some of the potentially interesting properties are still <br /> in limbo. <br /> d.) Conservation Easements (Page 48) <br /> The Conservation Easement component of the Lands Legacy program was initially <br /> funded in July 2002, and provides matching funds for State and federal grants to <br /> acquire conservation easements to conserve prime or threatened farmland, sensitive <br /> natural areas, or important water quality buffer lands in keeping with Board goals and <br /> Lands Legacy priorities. Generally, these lands have conservation values or <br /> agricultural operations to be enhanced and protected, and the land stays in private <br /> ownership and is not publicly-accessible except upon landowner consent. Over 2,000 <br /> acres of prime farmland and natural areas have been conserved to date, with millions <br /> of dollars in state/federal grants leveraged. It is anticipated that additional matching <br /> funds of approximately 50 percent would again be leveraged for these projects, as <br /> reflected in the grant funds above. This project would provide $250,000 each year for <br /> conservation easements, including $125,000 in County funds and an expected match <br /> amount of$125,000 from state/federal grants. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said Congress is looking to sell public lands, thus limiting <br /> conservation easement and park funding. He said federal funds should be aggressively <br /> pursued while they are still available. <br /> David Stancil said the County is in a position to do so. <br /> Chair McKee said the BOCC approved funding for the Lands Legacy on April 7th, 2015, <br /> and he asked how those funds play into this item. <br /> David Stancil said historically there have been separate accounts, due to the inability to <br /> mix funding streams from the 2001 bond funds. He said it is his understanding that some of <br /> the funds approved for the Lands Legacy could be re-tasked to assist with conservation. He <br /> said keeping a separate conservation account is still preferable. <br /> Chair McKee said he thought that if a portion of the Bond Lands Legacy funds was not <br /> accessed that it would lapse. <br /> Paul Laughton said $2.4 million did lapse. <br /> Chair McKee said because those monies did lapse, he thought the funds approved two <br /> nights ago would be kept separate and that it would not be bound by the same restrictions as <br /> Bond fund money would be. <br /> Paul Laughton said on page 51 it shows that the $2.4 million in the Lands Legacy <br /> project is kept separately. <br /> e.) Upper Eno Nature Preserve (Page 49) <br /> The Upper Eno Nature Preserve includes approximately 400 acres of sensitive natural <br /> heritage lands, wildlife habitat and prime forests along the Eno River and its main <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.