Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 8:58:51 AM
Creation date
5/18/2015 4:10:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-4
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Minutes 05-26-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 4 <br />Excerpt of draft April 1, 2015 DRAFT - SUMMARY NOTES <br />ORC meeting notes ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />APRIL 1, 2015 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE <br />NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck (Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; Lisa Stuckey (Vice- Chair), Chapel <br />Hill Township Representative; Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At -Large Chapel Hill <br />Township; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; Bryant Warren, Hillsborough Township <br />Representative <br />STAFF PRESENT: Perdita Holtz, Special Projects Coordinator; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Ashley <br />Moncado, Special Projects Planner <br />AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS — IMPERVIOUS SURFACE <br />To review and comment upon proposed revisions to the UDO to modify the existing <br />regulations pertaining to impervious surface <br />Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor <br />Michael Harvey: Reviewed text amendment. <br />Tony Blake: Are they aware they have to record an easement? <br />Michael Harvey: That is covered in the BMP Manual. <br />Tony Blake: You might want to mention that. <br />Michael Harvey: I will talk to Wesley Poole to see if I can figure out a way to address that. Yes it is covered, but a <br />reference would be reasonable. <br />Lisa Stuckey: I always thought BMPs were those ponds? Referenced page 25 regarding permeable pavement. Is <br />that a state BMP? <br />Michael Harvey: Out of fifty BMPs, only one gets credit for additional built upon area (i.e. additional impervious) and <br />that is permeable pavement. A permeable surface has to be maintained. There is a heightened level of expense <br />associated with the project. Keep in mind we may be looking at allowing additional stormwater features where you <br />can get an impervious surface increase if that features is based on an infiltration model. What I mean is that <br />stormwater is captured and allowed to infiltrate naturally rather than runoff into a ditch to be conveyed off -site. We <br />still do not know how the State will look at this so we are proceeding cautiously. <br />Paul Guthrie: What is an impervious surface? <br />Michael Harvey: By current county definition, gravel qualifies, asphalt, concrete, structure, house roof, etc. The state <br />is looking at modifying its definition of built upon area. <br />Lisa Stuckey: Is this something the BOCC initiated? <br />Michael Harvey: They approved our outline form. <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.