Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 9:12:19 AM
Creation date
5/18/2015 2:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-2
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Minutes 05-26-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
273 <br />A question was asked why the developer was not being required to extend a roadway <br />through the property to allow access to parcels towards the eastern property line. There <br />was also a concern expressed by an attendee this project would be allowed to tie into <br />existing residential neighborhoods to the north increasing traffic along these roadways. <br />Staff indicated it was not practical to extend the proposed roadway to the east due to <br />the presence of streams and floodplain and that all parcels to the east of the project <br />already had roadway access. The applicant indicated they had no interest in <br />connecting with adjoining subdivisions as they did not want to create traffic problems for <br />their neighbors. The applicant reminded all in attendance vehicular access to the <br />individual residences would not be permitted directly. Owners would park in designated <br />spaces and that access to the residences would be through a foot path. This path <br />would be accessible by emergency vehicles but it was not the plan to have cars driving <br />in the area. The applicant did indicate some residents would be allowed to use golf <br />carts to access this area but that vehicular traffic would be restricted in and around the <br />proposed residences. There was general discussion on the pedestrian walkway around <br />the houses and over the parking area for resident vehicles. <br />Staff concluded the meeting with a summary of the next steps in the process. The <br />meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:30pm. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.