Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 9:20:29 AM
Creation date
5/18/2015 12:14:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-1
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-26-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
25 <br />plant and animal species, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), and <br />the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list of threatened and endangered species for Orange <br />County were consulted. Appendix A contains a list of threatened, endangered and rare species <br />known in Orange County. <br />3.2. Field Investigation <br />Catena conducted the field survey on March 11, 2015, under warm and partly sunny conditions. <br />Floral (plant) communities, rare species habitat, and significant fauna (wildlife) observations <br />were identified and notable features were surveyed using a hand -held GPS unit (sub -meter <br />accuracy). <br />3.2.1. Floral Communities <br />Plant surveys were conducted during the field investigation. Natural communities follow those <br />described by Michael Schafale in the Guide to the Natural Communities 6f North Carolina, <br />Fourth Approximation (2012). A natural community is defined as, "A distinct and reoccurring <br />assemblage of populations of plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi naturally associated with each <br />other and their physical environment." ( Schafale 2012). Plant community types significantly <br />altered by human disturbance typically do not fall into a natural classification, and are thus <br />categorized in general terms (i.e. shrub /scrub, maintained /disturbed, etc.). Specimen trees or <br />other significant floral features encountered were noted and mapped. <br />3.2.2. Faunal Communities <br />Visual faunal surveys were conducted during the field investigation. This cursory effort <br />identified the presence of habitats suitable for protected and rare species, and also included field <br />identification of species encountered (visual observation of species, scat and /or tracks) to the <br />highest taxonomic level as practicable in the allocated timeframe. Sampling results (faunal <br />community) will be considered representative of the community /habitat type sampled. Important <br />faunal locations as observed during the field investigation were noted and mapped. <br />4.0 RESULTS <br />This section describes species composition and relative proportions of both natural and disturbed <br />vegetative communities within the project area. Dominant species within each community are <br />noted with a "D ". Faunal species typical of the plant community are provided and species <br />observed during the field investigation are noted with an " * ". Plant community mapping is <br />displayed on Figure 2. Scientific names are included in Appendix B. Photographs are included <br />in Appendix C. <br />EWS Biological Inventory March 2015 <br />Catena Job# 6210 Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.