Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
>
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2025 2:34:57 PM
Creation date
5/18/2015 12:14:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/2015
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
C-1
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Agenda
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2015\Agenda - 05-26-2015 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Minutes 05-26-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
178 <br /> physical development of the County as embodied in these <br /> regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan or portion thereof, <br /> adopted by the Board of County Commissioners <br /> 8. How are decisions made? <br /> Members of the board rendering the decision must make their decision solely on the competent, material <br /> and substantial evidence presented at the hearing,both for and against an application. <br /> Members cannot consider information obtained through independent research or undisclosed ex parte <br /> communications, meaning members cannot have private discussions with individuals who support or <br /> object to a specific application. <br /> 9. What exactly is ex parte communication and why is it not allowed? <br /> Persons affected by a decision have the legal right to hear all of the information presented to members of <br /> a board who will be rendering a decision on an SUP application, specifically they have a right to know <br /> all of the"facts"being considered. <br /> Therefore members of the decision-making body are not allowed to discuss the case or gather evidence <br /> outside of the hearing (what the courts term ex parte communication). Only facts presented to the full <br /> board at the hearing may be considered. <br /> This is an important point to remember when such applications are being reviewed. Members of the <br /> board rendering the decision are prohibited from discussing the matter or receiving comment on a <br /> proposal. <br /> These members are not trying to be rude or unsympathetic to your concerns. They are prohibited from <br /> engaging in the conversation in the first place as they are required.to guarantee an impartial hearing <br /> where the `facts' are weighed as they are presented as to whether or not an application should be <br /> granted. <br /> 10. You previously indicated decisions are based on evidence. Does this mean those presenting evidence <br /> at a SUP hearing have to be under oath? <br /> In a word, yes. All testimony, including from County staff, offered during the public hearing where a <br /> SUP is reviewed must be under oath. <br /> All persons wishing to speak will be given a reasonable time in which to be heard, however groups are <br /> encouraged to select a spokesperson to speak for the group in order to avoid repetitive testimony. <br /> 11. Can people just speak to offer their opinion on the application? <br /> Inflarmnatory, irrelevant, repetitive and incompetent testimony and hearsay is not permitted and the <br /> chairman of the board hearing the matter has the right to limit and restrict such comments during the <br /> public hearing. <br /> For more information please refer to Section 2.7.7 (D) of the UDO. <br /> 12. Wliat constitutes `competent,substantial, and material evidence'allowing for the approval or a denial <br /> ofaSUP? <br /> Breaking down what constitutes evidence can best be summarized as follows: <br /> i. Competent evidence: legally admissible under the rules of evidence unless admitted <br /> without objection, or appears to be sufficiently trustworthy and is admitted under such <br /> circumstances that it is reasonable for the decision-making body to rely upon it. <br /> Evidence that can be subjected to cross-examination, inspection, explanation and rebuttal <br /> (i.e. expert testimony). <br /> For example a realtor who has professional experience and accreditation can offer an <br /> opinion if a specific project will or will not impact the value of adjacent property. An <br /> individual with no background in the field cannot offer a `competent' opinion on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.