Agenda - 05-26-2015 - C-1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

126 Emerson Waldorf School Traffic Impact Analysis Table ES-2 — Level of Service and Delay (sec/veh) Results — Study Area Intersections Intersection 2014 Condition 1 2030 Condition 2 2030 Condition 3 2030 Condition 4 Existing Traffic Without Site Traffic With Site Traffic With Site Traffic& Im rovements AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Site Driveway 1/SR 1899(New A(9.3)^ A(9.2)^ A(9.3)^ A(9.2)A A(9.6)^ A(9.4)^ Jericho Road) Site Driveway 2/SR 1899(New A(3.8)^ A(5.1)A A(3.8)^ A(5.1)^ A(9.0)^ A(9.0)^ Jericho Road) i Site Driveway 3/SR 1899(New A(8.6)^ A(8.6)^ A(8.6)^ A(8.6)^ A(8.5)" A(8.6)^ Jericho Road) NC-86/SR 1718(Mt Sinai Road)I F(109.8)^ E(36.4)^ F(505.8)^ F(151.5)^ F(744.0)^ F(215.8)^ SR 1725(Millhouse Road) C(21 7) C(14.3) SR 1899(New Jericho Road)/ B(12.3)" B(11.1)^ B(12.6)^ B(11.2)^ C(16.1)^ B(12.8)^ SR 1726(Millhouse Road) Clyde Road/Chapel Hill A(8.0) A(8.1) A(8.2) A(8.4) A(8.7) A(8.6) Public Works Driveway/ SR 1725(Millhouse Road) SR 1725(Millhouse Road)/ A(8.9) A(7.5) B(11.0) A(8.5) B(13.8) A(8.7) SR 1727(Eubanks Road) ^=>Key unsignalized intersection movement *=>Delay incalculable (diMH)=>SimTraffic LOS&Delay(average of 5 runs) i 1 V. Conclusions and Recommendations In conclusion, the Emerson Waldorf School was analyzed for four separate conditions: 2014 existing (Condition 1), 2030 without the addition of site traffic j (Condition 2), 2030 with the addition of site traffic (Condition 3), and finally 2030 with the addition of site traffic and mitigated improvements (Condition 4). Table ES-2 above shows the levels of service and delay values for each analyzed condition. Traffic counts, performed by SEPI, form the basis for the analysis of Conditions 1 - 4. No offsite intersection improvements are recommended or necessary to help mitigate delay due to site traffic from the Emerson Waldorf School expansion.