Orange County NC Website
K <br />articulating requirements, evaluating proposals and vendor demonstrations, and <br />conducting post -demo follow -up to prepare for contract negotiations. <br />• Meetings with partner jurisdictions regarding the objectives and process to gain feedback <br />and additional insight. <br />• Exacting project definition and requirements analysis detailed in RFP 5202 released <br />August, 2014. (See Electronic Attachment: Orange County NC LMCPS RFP 5202 with <br />Appendices - http..11 ww.orangecountync. ov /150519 7b 2.p <br />• Careful evaluation of proposals received in September, 2014, with the outcome of a <br />short -list of two vendors for further evaluation. <br />• Detailed Proof -of- Concept (POC) scenarios including workflows, sample screens and <br />reports, which were provided to the short- listed vendors in November 2014. <br />• Two 2 -day vendor demonstrations in December 2014, attended by over 40 reviewers, <br />including staff from 7 departments (Planning & Inspections, Health, Information <br />Technologies, Tax Administration, Finance /Purchasing, Emergency Services, Solid <br />Waste), home builders, and representatives from the Towns of Hillsborough and <br />Carrboro. Over 250 evaluation feedback forms were collected from the 12 demo <br />sessions for each vendor. <br />• Contact with over 30 general and peer references in 13 jurisdictions between December <br />2014 and April 2015. <br />• Technical and cost follow -up calls and on -line functionality demos with the vendors for <br />further clarification. <br />• A summary decision matrix quantifying the results of the evaluation. (See Attached: <br />LMCPS RFP 5202 Sample Decision Matrix) <br />By this process and for these reasons, Energov, a product of Tyler Technologies, is the <br />recommended solution. Energov scored highest on the majority of the most heavily- weighted <br />criteria: <br />• process workflow; <br />• mobile inspections; <br />• parcel management and GIS integration; <br />• system navigation and ease of use; <br />• company positioned to take advantage of upcoming technologies; <br />• company prospects going forward; <br />• vendor responsiveness, e.g., understanding of objectives <br />• and expectation of future support. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: The following is the summary of budget impacts, and estimated contract <br />and yearly operating costs. <br />The software licensing, hardware, implementation, first year maintenance and support costs are <br />not to exceed $1,300,000 with recurring maintenance and support costs not to exceed <br />$100,000 per year in years two through five. Funding for this project is one component of the <br />Final Financing Resolution agenda item being considered at tonight's meeting. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board of Commissioners authorize <br />the Manager to execute the contract with Tyler Technologies and any amendments thereto for a <br />County- hosted, vendor implemented system subject final review by the County Attorney. <br />