Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
I <br />versus the addition of greater capacity when a new school is constructed and completed. This <br />process will pose some challenges to SAPFO compared to the existing process which indicates <br />in advance when a completely new school is needed. The renovation and expansion to existing <br />facilities may delay construction of new schools further into the future. For example, in 2014 <br />projections showed a need for CHCCS Middle School #5 in 2018 -19. However, once the <br />Culbreth Middle School addition of 104 seats was added into the 10 -year student membership <br />projections, the need for CHCCS Middle School #5 was pushed back to 2020 -21. Decisions on <br />the timing of reconstruction funding would be indirectly linked to the SAPFO model. <br />The exact pages of the 2015 SAPFOTAC report that the BOCC will be acknowledging and <br />certifying are listed below. The context (i.e.- definitions and standards) of the various SAPFO <br />elements precedes the data to be certified and is within the full Report. <br />• Student /Housing Generation Rate <br />At the January 2014 SAPFOTAC meeting, committee members discussed the increased <br />number of students generated in both school districts from new development, particularly <br />multifamily housing. This topic had also been discussed in previous years. The SAPFOTAC <br />recommended further evaluation of the adopted Student Generation Rates and the impacts <br />the number of bedrooms a particular housing type may have on student generation rates. As <br />a result, Orange County entered into a contract with TischlerBise to study student generation <br />Page in <br />Element <br />SAPFOTAC <br />Certification to be made by BOCC <br />Report <br />Building Capacity <br />11 through 16 <br />Building capacity and current year <br />with CIP changes <br />membership for OCS and CHCCS were <br />approved at the December 1, 2014 <br />(Change from previous year) <br />meeting. <br />Student Membership Projection <br />19 <br />Certification that the average of 5 models <br />Methodology <br />will be used, as noted in #3 on page 19 <br />(No Change from previous year) <br />Student Membership Projections <br />37 and 38 <br />• Orange County Elementary, Middle, and <br />High Schools Student Projections (row <br />that notes average only) (p. 37) <br />• Chapel Hill /Carrboro Elementary, <br />Middle, and High Schools Student <br />Projections (row that notes average <br />(Change from previous year) <br />only) (p. 38) <br />Student Membership Growth Rate <br />39 <br />. Orange County Elementary, Middle, and <br />High Schools <br />• Chapel Hill /Carrboro Elementary, <br />(Change from previous year) <br />Middle, and High Schools <br />Student/Housing Generation Rate <br />42 <br />. Orange County Elementary, Middle, and <br />High Schools <br />• Chapel Hill /Carrboro Elementary, <br />(Change from previous year) <br />Middle, and High Schools <br />• Student /Housing Generation Rate <br />At the January 2014 SAPFOTAC meeting, committee members discussed the increased <br />number of students generated in both school districts from new development, particularly <br />multifamily housing. This topic had also been discussed in previous years. The SAPFOTAC <br />recommended further evaluation of the adopted Student Generation Rates and the impacts <br />the number of bedrooms a particular housing type may have on student generation rates. As <br />a result, Orange County entered into a contract with TischlerBise to study student generation <br />