Orange County NC Website
3 <br />1 <br />Commissioner Burroughs said she had no petitions. <br />2 <br />Commissioner Rich said in 2014 the Arts Commission came to the Visitor’s Bureau to <br />3 <br />secure funding for a sculpture. She said the Boardreportedlyapproved the sculpture in 2009 <br />4 <br />and it was intended to go in front of the Orange County library. She said that particular <br />5 <br />sculpture has grown in scope and was not placedin front of the library. She said the Board of <br />6 <br />the Visitor’s Bureau agreed to fund half of the original price, which was around $8000. She said <br />7 <br />theBOCCdoes not currently have a policy for funding art and placement in Orange County. <br />8 <br />She said that the Visitor’s Bureau asked her to petition the BOCC to set up a committee to <br />9 <br />address the issue. She said the committee would contain a County Commissioner, likely <br />10 <br />herself,but it does not have to be, LauriePaolicelli, the Director of the Visitor’s Bureau, Steve <br />11 <br />Brantley and an additionalmember from both the Visitor’s Bureau and the Arts Commission. <br />12 <br />Commissioner Rich said she petitioned at the last Assembly of Governments(AOG) <br />13 <br />meeting regarding thepossibility of moving the Visitor’s Bureau into the Inter-Faith Council <br />14 <br />(IFC)shelter once it is vacated by its current tenants. She said it was suggested that Jaime <br />15 <br />Rohe come and speak on how Orange County can appropriately address homelessness. She <br />16 <br />said that she would like to forward the discussion on this issue in order to be adequately <br />17 <br />prepared within anticipated time frames. <br />18 <br />CommissionerPelissier referenced current best practices to serve the homeless <br />19 <br />population and how they are different from what is currently done in the area. She saidat the <br />20 <br />last meeting of the Partnership to End Homelessness they voted to amend their process of <br />21 <br />addressing this issue. She suggested adding the topic to a future work session including a full <br />22 <br />presentation so that the BOCC can be better informed. <br />23 <br />Commissioner Jacobs responded to Commissioner Rich’s first petition. He said after <br />24 <br />the 2001 Bond,the Board of County Commissioners did discuss a policy of allocating a penny <br />25 <br />of every dollar spent on new buildingstowards art. He said the matter was not agreed upon. <br />26 <br />He said art has been installed but thereis no policy. He emphasized the importance of art and <br />27 <br />having a financial commitment to it. <br />28 <br />Commissioner Price said she is pleased with the reception from Chapel Hill regarding <br />29 <br />Orange County’s involvement in the veteran’s memorial. <br />30 <br />Commissioner Price saidshe would like an update regarding the policy of naming <br />31 <br />buildings and spaces after individuals. She referenced the community request to rename the <br />32 <br />Central Orange Senior Center, or a space there within, to honor past Department on Aging <br />33 <br />Director Jerry Passmore. <br />34 <br />Commissioner Price petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to endorse My <br />35 <br />Brother’s Keeper Community Challenge,thus making it a County initiative and allowing an <br />36 <br />account to be established to accept contributions from the community in support of My Brother’s <br />37 <br />Keeper events. She referenced support from other local governmentsand asked the BOCC to <br />38 <br />endorse it so that forward progress can be made regarding upcoming youth events. <br />39 <br />Chair McKee said all petitions would be referred through the standard procedures. He <br />40 <br />said that they would try to address Commissioner Price’spetitionregarding My Brother’s <br />41 <br />Keeper as quickly as possible. <br />42 <br />Commissioner Price suggested the possibility of avote on the petition at an upcoming <br />43 <br />work session. <br />44 <br />Chair McKee said it was standard procedure not to vote at work sessions. He said he <br />45 <br />was confident that established procedures could be followed and the matter may still be voted <br />46 <br />on in a timely fashion. <br />47 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said he would be comfortable adding thisto the work session on <br />th <br />48 <br />April 9.He said this has been done in the past when waiting two weeks for a regular meeting <br />49 <br />was undesirable. <br />50 <br />Chair McKee said he would prefer to stay within their currentpolicy. <br /> <br />