Orange County NC Website
Attachment 1  Planning Board Recommended Process <br />A <br />6 <br />PossibleReview Process for Quasi-JudicialItems <br />Requiredfor all Special Use Permit applications <br />Pre-Application Conference <br />The Planning Department intends to begin posting a <br />list of applications received and deemed sufficient <br />on itswebsite so members of the public can be <br />informed about projectsearly in the process.Staff <br /> <br />also intends to produce and provide planning <br />Application Submittal& <br />process brochures outlining how input is provided <br /> by the public and applicant. <br />Posting * <br /> <br />Staff Representatives of various County <br />departments and other agencies, as needed <br /> <br />DAC (Development Advisory <br />Committee) Review/Comments <br /> <br /> <br />Text amendment requiring this new step was adopted by <br /> <br />the BOCC on 11/18/14. <br />Planning Board members will be encouraged to attend <br /> <br />the Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM).Attempts <br />will be made to schedule the NIM the same evening as <br /> <br />Neighborhood Information <br />the regular Planning Board meetings so that Planning <br />Meeting (minimum of 45 days <br />Board members can more easily attend the NIM. <br />prior to public hearing)* <br />However, it might sometimes not be possible to hold <br />both meetings on the same night due to timing <br />requirements and because Ordinance Review Committee <br />meetings needs to be held periodically as well. <br /> <br />Planning Board Meetingto <br />Review Application / Make <br />The Planning Board meeting (which would be held on a <br />Recommendation* <br />date after the NIM but before the formal public hearing) <br />could be a “dry run” for the public hearing. At this time, <br />staff is suggesting that the public would be allowed to <br />speak at the Planning Board meeting(e.g., “testimony” <br />would not be required at the Planning Board meeting, <br />Publish Legal Ad/ Mail but speakers would need to be informed that their <br />Notifications forPublic <br />comments would not be considered testimony and, <br />Hearing <br />therefore, could not be a basis for decision at the formal <br /> <br />public hearing). <br /> <br /> <br />The draft legal ad would no longer be a Consent Agenda <br />item. It would be circulated via e-mail to BOCC members <br />Quarterly Public Hearing <br /> <br />a few days prior to publication with the County Manager, <br />(BOCC only)* <br />Attorney, and Planning Directorresolvingany conflicting <br /> <br />comments. <br /> <br />An increase in frequency for quasi-judicial items is no longer <br />BOCC Decision <br />being suggested. <br />Planning Board members would be encouraged to attend but <br />a quorum of members would not be necessary in order to <br />hold the hearing. <br />Sworn testimony by experts (who are provided by the <br />applicant or parties with standing) is necessary for quasi- <br />judicial items. The public hearing should be closed at the <br />conclusion of the hearingunless additional information has <br />been requested.Additional information would need to either <br />be in writing (if appropriate) or the hearing would be <br />continued to a date/time certain for additional oral testimony. <br />At the conclusion of the hearing, the BOCC could do the <br />following: <br />1.Defer a decision to a later BOCC meeting date. <br />2.Refer an applicationback to the Planning Board for <br />further review. <br />* = public participates <br />3.Make a decision at the conclusion of the hearing. <br /> <br />