Agenda - 05-12-2015 - 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

38 Approved 11/5/14 967 Paul Guthrie: Probably a good idea. 968 969 Laura Nicholson: To me there is just some things that seem really cut and dried and there are some things that are 970 really squishy. Is there a way we can delineate that and say these things we agree on and bring a recommendation 971 on these things and these things we still want to talk about more, is that a possibility? 972 973 Pete Hallenbeck: Part of why I tried to say it’s important to be at the QPH not wild about the quorum and you’re 974 comments you really think the quorum will help. The Planning Board taking citizen input, it sounds like everybody is 975 good with that and more input is good. We realize this is legislative that is 88% of what we see, all Planning Board 976 members get notification of any neighborhood information meetings and we realize that the quasi-judicial is a 977 problem for another day we need more education as there are very strict rules. That’s ok because we’ve just dealt 978 with 88% of what we deal with and I would say that’sthe summation of what we are putting before the 979 Commissioners along with this process. 980 981 Craig Benedict: Chair, based on the direction the Commissioners gave the manager and the attorney and staff is this 982 interim report is not going to make decision so, that interim report will say probably some things are easier to achieve 983 and some things are a little bit harder so I think in essence we are going to get some ideas on which way we can 984 move with it. Where’s there’s some clarity and which areas might need alittle more time. That’s why they said the 985 November 6meeting wouldn’t have everything done by then. We’ll let them know where we are in the process that th 986 we were getting consensus on some areas and we are also determining that there are differences, clear differences, 987 on how the Board’s role is for quasi-judicial versus legislative and how we get community input that might take a little 988 longer. 989 990 Pete Hallenbeck: That’s also why we’re not going to vote tonight on this and what we recommend. We’ve talked 991 they get to sludge through it and see what we’re thinking and it goes on from there. Ok, the last item on the agenda, 992 I’ll entertain a motion to adjourn 993 994 995 AI11: C/ABR: GENDA TEM OMMITTEEDVISORY OARD EPORTS 996 a.Board of Adjustment 997 998 999 AI12: A: GENDA TEM DJOURNMENT 1000 1001 byBryant Warrento adjourn. Seconded by Buddy Hartley. M OTION 1002 : VU OTENANIMOUS 1003 1004 1005 Email from Lydia Wegman: 1006 1007 Lydia Wegman [mailto:lnwegman@gmail.com] From: 1008 Wednesday, October 08, 2014 2:12 PM Sent: 1009 Perdita Holtz To: 1010 Re: October Planning BoardMaterials Subject: 1011 1012 Hi Perdita, 1013 1014 Thanks for that helpful explanation of the status of the recommendations on the public hearing process. I am very 1015 sorry to be missing the discussion tonight. As a new member of the Board, I feel I would benefit from hearing the 1016 views of the folks who have served on the Board longer than I. I do, however, have two thoughts to offer, which are 1017 laid out in the next paragraph. In addition to that, I plan to read the minutes of tonight’s discussion and then offer my 1018 thoughts on the conclusions reached, if any. I know this is not the best way to engage in discussion, but given that I 1019 am out of town, I think it’s the best I can do. 1020 19