Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 6d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 6d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 9:58:28 AM
Creation date
5/1/2015 8:55:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6d
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-05-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iir. <br />B. RATIONALE <br />1. Purpose /Mission <br />In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified <br />Development Ordinance Amendments of the UDO, the Planning Director has <br />initiated a text amendment to revise existing regulations governing the review and <br />approval of airports. This is one of the items in the UDO implementation bridge. <br />During the development of the UDO, there were efforts by the State and the <br />University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to locate a new airport in rural Orange <br />County. The State General Assembly created a new airport authority in Orange <br />County for the purpose of developing a new facility intended to take the place of <br />Horace - Williams airport, which was slated to be closed with the development of <br />Carolina North, in the Town of Chapel Hill. <br />These efforts were, ultimately, abandoned due to local community concerns over the <br />process initiated by the State Legislature and the University. The State rescinded <br />the airport authority and, as of the writing of this document, no additional activity has <br />occurred. <br />At that time staff identified a need to revise existing regulations governing the <br />development of airports. Work on this issue was delayed while more pressing UDO <br />amendments were pursued. <br />2. Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: <br />`cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based upon that analysis, <br />prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning Board and the Board of <br />County Commissioners'. <br />Airport and other similar facilities are combined into a central land use category, <br />specifically Airports, General Aviation, Heliports, STOL, defined within the UDO as <br />fol lows: <br />"Airport (Heliport: S. T. O.L. Port), Air Carrier: A public airport served by a certified air <br />carrier. This includes any runways, land areas or other facilities designed or used for <br />landing, taking off, processing passengers or cargo. <br />• Airport, Commuter Service (Heliport: S.T.O.L. Port): A public airport, not served by a <br />certified air carrier, but is served by one or more commuter airlines which enplaned <br />2500 or more passengers in the preceding calendar year. <br />• Airport, General Aviation (Heliport: S. T. O.L. Port): A public airport serving aviation <br />other than airlines. This includes any runway, land area, or other facility designed or <br />used for the landing and taking off of small aircraft." <br />Such use(s) are only permitted through the review and approval of a Class A Special <br />Use Permit by the BOCC in the following general use zoning districts: <br />1. Rural Buffer (RB); <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.