Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 9:58:49 AM
Creation date
5/1/2015 8:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-05-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />1 foundational to the solid waste program in reducing the waste stream, and because of this she <br />2 is less inclined to agree that it makes sense to pay proportionally. She said it is important to <br />3 send a message about the value of reducing the waste stream. She said she does not want to <br />4 ask people to pay more for the services that they do not have, when those same people have <br />5 been subsidizing those services by others by virtue of the fact that they have not had them. <br />6 She said there have been investments in the towns before the rural areas, and this investment <br />7 has included the wear and tear on rural resident's cars as they travel to the convenience <br />8 centers, and it has been on their time and the neglect on the waste stream in rural areas. She <br />9 said the towns are just going to return that investment. <br />10 Alderman Chaney said the fee is going to be lower under either one of these options, <br />11 and single family properties will pay lower fees, so a lot of people will already see savings. She <br />12 said both plans put a higher burden on the commercial sector, and to some degree, the multi - <br />13 family sector, which is somewhat troubling. However, she said these are also the sectors with <br />14 the highest burden on the system. She said single fee system allows a reduction in stress on <br />15 some users, and sends a clear message to others that the goal is increasing service and better <br />16 meeting needs. She said she is not opposed to a pilot program, but she thinks this pilot should <br />17 be the single fee system, and it should be for three years, to allow for more data. She said the <br />18 data should be about real cost, and if fuel cost is going to be considered, the fuel cost for <br />19 residents using the SWCC should be considered. <br />20 Commissioner Price said she agreed with Alderman Chaney. She noted that option 1 <br />21 will mean that rural residents will pay $24 more for a service they will not get for three years, <br />22 and this is unfair. <br />23 Commissioner Dorosin said the two tiered system is inherently divisive. He said this is a <br />24 place where a one - size - fits -all would work. He said he is not sure a pilot program is needed, <br />25 but if it is, it would need to go longer than a year. He said everyone feels there is some service <br />26 they are subsidizing but not using. He said a single fee makes sense, and this is where it <br />27 should start. <br />28 Commissioner Jacobs said the County does subsidize 700 households, and this could <br />29 be looked at as just the start. He said one component that is not quantified is the educational <br />30 component, and this could be built upon. <br />31 Commissioner Jacobs said there are a lot of issues involved in the solid waste <br />32 enterprise that could do with more analysis. He does not understand the necessity of a pilot <br />33 program, but he thinks there should be a requirement to scrutinize all of the numbers and <br />34 assumptions. He said Orange County will be upgrading and re- opening the Eubanks SWCC <br />35 next year, and the number of users from the towns will increase over time. He said the smart <br />36 thing to do is to take a comprehensive look at this as it goes along, and there may be a need <br />37 for reasonable changes to some of these components. He said these are the numbers and <br />38 data that have to be used right now. <br />39 Commissioner Jacobs said there are many other weighty issues, but recycling is <br />40 something that everyone agrees is a high value for the community. He said nothing has to be <br />41 decided tonight, but it will be important next week for the respective boards to have given some <br />42 indication of where they want this to go. <br />43 Commissioner Jacobs said that he went into the process with the SWAG thinking that <br />44 either option was fine, but he was persuaded by other representatives about the benefit of one <br />45 flat fee. Commissioner Jacobs said too much has been spent talking about the urban -rural <br />46 divide. He said there is also too much time spent talking about who is putting something over <br />47 on someone else. He said it is important to be united and look at the bigger picture. He said <br />48 this is an example of how to start moving in that direction. <br />49 Commissioner Jacobs said he has been convinced to go with option 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.