Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 9:58:49 AM
Creation date
5/1/2015 8:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 05-05-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />Mayor Kleinschmidt said it would be easier to pilot a program with two fees rather than a <br />single fee. He said his Town Council has talked about this and felt that it would be more <br />difficult to change a fee once it is implemented as a single fee. He said data could continue to <br />be gathered over a pilot period in order to determine whether the fee structure should be further <br />adjusted. <br />Council Member Ward said Mayor Kleinschmidt summarized it well. He said he <br />articulated at the SWAG meetings as a representative of his constituents, that option 1 more <br />closely sets the fee rate at the cost of services that the citizens are actually getting. He said <br />the snapshot survey does show that Chapel Hill is paying more for the SWCCs than the citizens <br />actually use. He said there is no need to parse that out at this time, and the Town is supportive <br />of option 1 on a trial basis of one year. He said the goal would be to have the SWAG continue <br />to look at this issue or to investigate this trial period later in the year in order to make a more <br />informed decision for 2016 -17. <br />Mayor Lavelle said, at the SWAG meetings, she was in favor of funding option 2. She <br />liked the idea of roll out carts going to everyone and the idea of establishing a holistic <br />countywide approach. She found it difficult to look at all of the services that Orange County <br />provides and to parse out those things that benefitted County residents versus urban residents. <br />She said she looks at this as a countywide effort; everyone pays property taxes, and everyone <br />pays the same fee. She said the survey illustrates that people in the County are continuing to <br />use the SWCCs more because they do not have roll out carts yet. She said there has been a <br />21 percent increase in recycling with the rollout carts in the urban areas, and there may be such <br />an increase with the rollout to the County. In her view, it feels like it makes more sense to go <br />forward with one fee. <br />Commissioner Price said she concurs with Mayor Lavelle. She said option 2 is fair to <br />everyone. She said some services are just basic to the County. She pays for education in the <br />County and she is glad to do it, even though she does not have children in the system. She <br />said she feels there should be a flat fee for everyone. <br />Town Commissioner Wenn said she is supportive of a flat fee. She said any countywide <br />issues are in need of countywide support, and a flat fee is an easier sale to their constituents. <br />Town Commissioner Ferguson said the other element that she felt was important was to <br />encourage usage. She said there are rural residents who have concerns with the higher fees. <br />She said the single fee lowers the barrier to usage, which has an impact. She said this needs <br />to be looked at holistically. <br />Commissioner Pelissier said she supports a flat fee. She said the goal is to get people <br />to recycle for all of the environmental benefits. She said equity is not the primary goal here, but <br />it is equity to say that there is a flat fee for everyone in this County. She said part of this is a <br />perception issue, and she would not want to tell farmers and other rural residents that they have <br />to pay more because they live in a rural environment. <br />Alderman O'Donnell said everyone is in this together as a county, and she supports the <br />flat fee. She is a teacher and she spends time teaching kids to understand that the mindset <br />should not just be about taking care of their own recycling. She said the goal is to get people to <br />understand the value of taking care of the existing waste as a whole as well as individually. <br />She said the flat fee says that we are going to take care of recycling together as a County. <br />Commissioner Burroughs said she has become increasingly focused on the $9 <br />difference between option 1 and option 2. She thinks of this $9 and the constituency, and this <br />amount could be a struggle for some people. She said she wants to work together to help <br />struggling homeowners. She said it is important to focus on what that $9 means and to whom it <br />means something. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.