Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
55 <br />56 <br />57 <br />58 <br />59 <br />60 <br />61 <br />62 <br />63 <br />64 <br />65 <br />66 <br />67 <br />68 <br />69 <br />70 <br />71 <br />72 <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />76 <br />77 <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />81 <br />82 <br />83 <br />84 <br />85 <br />86 <br />87 <br />88 <br />89 <br />90 <br />91 <br />92 <br />93 <br />94 <br />95 <br />96 <br />97 <br />98 <br />99 <br />100 <br />101 <br />102 <br />103 <br />104 <br />Approved 6/4/14 <br />AGENDA ITEM 10: 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT <br />AMENDMENTS: To make a recommendation to the BOCC on government - initiated <br />amendments to the text of the UDO to establish a zoning program commonly referred to <br />Agricultural Support Enterprises (ASE) within the Rural Buffer land use classification. This <br />item was heard at the February 24, 2014 quarterly public hearing and was previewed at the <br />April 2, 2014 Planning Board meeting. The text amendments can be adopted by the BOCC <br />only if the Joint Planning Land Use Plan and Agreement (item #9 above) is adopted by all <br />three local governments (Orange County, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro). <br />Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Special Projects Coordinator <br />Perdita Holtz: Reviewed Abstract <br />Tony Blake: I have one question, under exclusions, these apply to the rural area and the Rural Buffer or just to the <br />Rural Buffer? <br />Perdita Holtz: All of these apply to the outside of the Rural Buffer but it will also apply within the Rural Buffer if this <br />amendment is adopted. No changes were necessary to that red text in order to make it apply to the Rural Buffer. <br />Lisa Stuckey: There was a lot here about water usage which seemed very forward thinking to me but on page 222, <br />the `greenhouse with on premise sales', there was nothing in that section having to do with water. <br />Perdita Holtz: The reason it is not in there is that is an existing use that is allowed everywhere and it doesn't <br />currently have that ground water use standard. We are looking at it as `do we want to make is more restrictive than it <br />is already' for a use that is already covered in the UDO. <br />Herman Staats: Didn't you also say that bona fide farming operations is not regulated by this. <br />Perdita Holtz: Correct, and any water usage done by the bona fide farm is not regulated. It is just the additional <br />water that would be necessary to run the regulated use. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: I think, also last month we commented, you have to be pretty crazy to start up some sort of <br />business for ag use and depend solely on well water. <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Does anyone have any questions? <br />MOTION by Lisa Stuckey to recommend approval to the BOCC. Seconded by Tony Blake. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />11: COMMITTEE /ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS: <br />--, a. Board of Adjustment <br />Efland- Mebane Small Area Plan Implementation Fo roup (community meeting on <br />2014 regarding proposed Efland zonin rlay districts) <br />Pete Hallenbeck: Updated the Board on pu ' inform ' meeting held in Efland regarding the proposed overlay <br />districts. <br />AGENDA ITEM 12: AD40 RNMENT: <br />W <br />Pete Hallenbeck, Chair <br />54 <br />