Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 05-05-2015 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2015 10:00:37 AM
Creation date
5/1/2015 8:49:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
2015-197 Statement of Consistency of Proposed Comprehensive Plan and UDO Amendments with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and/or other Adopted County Plans
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2015
Minutes 05-05-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
ORD-2015-011 Ordinance Amending the Orange County Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br />Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board comment on <br />the proposed amendment. <br />Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be <br />returned to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the September 4, 2014 <br />BOCC regular meeting. <br />Adjourn the public hearing until September 4, 2014 in order to receive and accept the <br />Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br />Commissioner Gordon referred to the use specific standards chart and asked why this is <br />not included in the rural buffer section. <br />Perdita Holtz said the standards are the same in the rural buffer as they are in the <br />agricultural residential. She referred to the amendment package, in article 5 and said any <br />amendments in red are just adding RB to a few sections. She said the standards are the same, <br />and there has been no re -write of standards to make it pertain to the rural buffer. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked how the Planning Board consideration interfaces with the <br />joint planning consideration. <br />Perdita Holtz said, within the rural buffer, the planning board will make a <br />recommendation on the JPA amendments as well. She said the planning board will be briefed <br />on this in April, and information will be shared from the public hearing, planned for March 27tH <br />She said the UDO revisions being considered tonight will be on the April planning board agenda <br />for them to make a recommendation as well. <br />Commissioner Gordon said the recommendation will be made with just the hearing <br />comments, but not with the comments from the jurisdictions. <br />Perdita Holtz said the UDO amendments are not what are being heard at the March 27th <br />joint public hearing; this is to hear amendments to the joint planning land use plan and <br />agreement, and there are very few amendments that need to occur. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for a memo listing those amendments. <br />Perdita Holtz said this can be done. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked when the input on the UDO from the Chapel Hill and <br />Carrboro public officials will come. <br />Perdita Holtz said public officials don't comment on UDO amendments unless staff <br />wants to bring something to their attention. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked when these comments are due. <br />Perdita Holtz said these were due by tonight, but these will still be accepted while the <br />public hearing process is going on. She said written comments can be submitted as part of the <br />JPA process. <br />Chair Jacobs asked if there are any items in this proposal that have the same issues that <br />the attorney and staff had in the previous proposal. <br />Perdita Holtz said this is not due to come back until September, so this is not an issue. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to: <br />1. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to <br />the Board of County Commissioners in time for the September 4, 2014 BOCC regular <br />meeting. <br />2. Adjourn the public hearing until September 4, 2014 in order to receive and accept the <br />Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.