Orange County NC Website
c. 2015 Oranqe Public Transportation Title VI Plan <br /> The Board considered: 1) Adopting a resolution approving and authorizing the draft of <br /> the 2015 Orange Public Transportation Title VI Plan/Program, and 2) Authorize the Orange <br /> County Transportation Planning staff to submit the plan to the North Carolina Department of <br /> Transportation and Federal Transit Administration. <br /> Bret Martin said the Title VI plan is a federal requirement for Orange Public <br /> Transportation (OPT) to remain eligible for federal transit funding. He said the federal <br /> guidelines lay out the requirements of the plan, including specific information that must be <br /> disseminated to the public related to their rights; complaint procedures and forms; public <br /> outreach plans to engage minority and non-English speaking populations; plan for assistance <br /> to those populations; and a racial breakdown of the OUTBoard members. He said the NC <br /> DOT has given OPT a deadline of the end of March to submit the plan. <br /> Commissioner porosin asked who is identified as the Title VI coordinator in Orange <br /> County. <br /> Bret Martin said Peter Murphy is the coordinator. <br /> Commissioner porosin said Title VI is an anti—discrimination provision. He said this is a <br /> comprehensive report, but he did not see much about the demographic of the ridership. He <br /> would like to see this information if it is available, and if not, he would like to see a plan for <br /> gathering it. <br /> Bret Martin said there are no plans in place, but it is possible to get this information. He <br /> said the Title VI requirements are more difficult as transportation systems get larger, and this <br /> demographic requirement is in place for systems that operate more than 50 vehicles in a fixed <br /> route service. He said OPT is not doing this, but it can be done. <br /> Craig Benedict said socioeconomic data was looked at during the creation of the 5 year <br /> plan, especially in the Efland Cheeks area, which was one of the highest transit dependent <br /> populations. He said the ridership data will be looked at more once the service is in place. <br /> Commissioner porosin said Title VI does not include socioeconomic status as a <br /> protected class. He said the Family Success Alliance has been doing some census mapping, <br /> and there may be an opportunity for some synergy there. <br /> He said there is a lot of information in this plan regarding access to interpreters for <br /> passengers with limited English proficiency, but he did not see anything about providing <br /> language training for drivers to become bi-lingual. He said this might be something worth <br /> incentivizing for folks who will be on the front lines. <br /> Chair McKee said he has heard a request for more information on the demographics <br /> and a request to look into the possibility of bilingual training. He said it seems like it is the <br /> consensus of the Board to endorse these requests. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked if there are already documents available that have been <br /> translated into other languages for their ridership. If not, she would like to suggest this. <br /> Commissioner Price echoed this suggestion. <br /> Commissioner Price referred to page 6, and asked if complaints can be submitted by <br /> email. She asked Bret Martin to look into this. <br /> Commissioner Price asked if letters will be sent by certified mail. <br /> Bret Martin said all correspondence regarding complaints will be handled by certified <br /> mail. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said with the expansion of this service this summer, the system will <br /> grow, and the size will require staff to look at these issues more diligently. She said staff is <br /> committed to putting more systems in place to track information and reporting this information <br /> back to the Board. <br />