Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-19-2008-C.3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 05-19-2008
>
Agenda - 05-19-2008-C.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2012 11:44:36 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:11:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/19/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080519
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br />(the predominance of) transit-ready, wallcable, mixed-use, communities" are all present in <br />sustainable and equitable proportions? <br />® Will the CPU be clear about where "new compact, walkable; mixed-use, transit-supportive <br />growth and development" can be built and built in sufficient number to accommodate the <br />demand that Orange County attracts? and <br />® Does the plan "make affirmative commitments to providing public sector infrastructure <br />inveshnents to stimulate" the kind of sustainable development the coalition hopes results <br />from the CPU. (see below**). <br />The coalition does not expect the CPU proposal to completely satisfy these criteria. We realize <br />trade offs and compromises will be required. Still, these are our core criteria and if the CPU falls <br />significantly short, it will cause concern for us. <br />Finally, there are two more items, which I personally believe warrant special attention beyond <br />those found in the CSO. <br />First, the CPU should include a mechanism for aligning the county's capital budgeting and <br />public finance capacity with the goals and objectives of the CPU. Issues related to water and <br />sewer infrastructure investment are particularly important. <br />Second, the CPU should include a mechanism for assuring residents and other stakeholders that <br />the recent and ongoing small -area planning initiatives, including the Hillsborough/Orange <br />County Strategic Growth Plan, and major development proposals like Buckhorn Village are <br />consistent with the direction the CPU is taking. <br />Thank. you for your time. <br />Allan Rosen <br />The Village Project Board of Directors <br />Acting Chair, the Orange County Comprehensive Plan Coalition <br />* T11ese criteria are included in the coalition's vision statement, which is printed in the coalition's <br />brochure. <br />* * from the coalition's brochure, "The Coalition defines sustainability as managing the impacts of human <br />activity on local and global resources and habitats in order to ensure that we provide for the needs of <br />current residents without compromising the quality of life for future generations. Our primary goal for the <br />people of Orange County is to achieve this "sustainable" outcome by creating ecologically-sensitive <br />patterns of development, especially by concentrating our urban footprint. <br />4of16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.