Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-19-2008-C.3
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 05-19-2008
>
Agenda - 05-19-2008-C.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2012 11:44:36 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:11:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/19/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c3
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080519
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17 <br />"Public" -For the public hearing draft, will subdivision data be updated? <br />Mr. Alfieri -This will not be available in the public hearing draft but I expect that it will <br />be in the plan that is ultimately adopted. Staff is working to update the data. <br />"Public" - I Suggest to add a column. to the subdivision data that includes an average the <br />overall number of lots created each year. <br />"Public" -What is the real power of the plan? Does it have funding associated with it or <br />does it pick up the force of law? Do County Commissioners' just refer to it when malting <br />decisions? <br />Mr. Altieri -The document is a policy guide for the County. Comprehensive plans are <br />not regulatory in NC. One portion of the plan that is close to being regulatory is the <br />future land use map. In Orange County to rezone property it has to be consistent with the <br />future land use map. There is a strong linkage between zoning and the map. Nothing is <br />binding or requiring the County Commissioners to carry out the goals. <br />"Public" -Has it been a strong guide in the past? Or does it only just satisfy participants <br />without much impact? <br />Mr. Altieri -The plan from 1981 identified goals and the county has done a good job of <br />trying to achieve those goals. Through our public outreach efforts, we have learned that <br />the County has made more progress on some goals than others. It has been a strong guide <br />in the past and I expect that to continue. <br />Mr. Benedict, Planning Director -You are asking how will the plan be operationalized? <br />Boundaries of urban areas surrounding existing municipalities have been a strong link to <br />a lot of other decisions that have been made in the past. For example -where will public <br />water and sewer be? The document helps guide and is a foundation for a lot of fiscal <br />policies and public service policies. <br />"Public" -.Ultimately the only tangible product of this process that people adhere to is a <br />map? Is the process going to shape a new map? Is it also going to be the document that <br />will shape the new map that will be adhered to? Are there comments as to why this policy <br />should affect zoning? <br />Mr. Altieri -Overall, the Plan is a policy guide. However, the Future Land Use Map or <br />Plan supports the County's Zoning Ordinance and map and therefore, has regulatory <br />aspects. There are objectives in the draft Plan that could lead to map amendments. For <br />example, the draft Plan recognizes some inconsistencies between the County's Water and <br />Sewer Boundary Agreement Map and the Future Land Use Map that is included in the <br />Comprehensive Plan and includes an objective to study and eliminate inconsistencies <br />through map amendments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.