Orange County NC Website
2 <br />The latest cost estimates for both remaining elements of the project (the central Efland and <br />northern Buckhorn communities are contained within the preliminary Engineer's Report) indicate <br />that the total cost of the project will approach approximately $4.32 million compared to currently <br />available project revenues totaling $2.5 million. This sum exceeds earlier estimates and the <br />project budget by more than $1.82 million. On March 12, 2008, the County Manager shared <br />tentative County debt issuance plans with the Board at their budget work session. Included in <br />those plans was a proposal to include the additional funding for Efland Sewer in a future debt <br />issuance. <br />The Board may also want to consider other project construction alternatives: <br />1. Reduce the size of the project to fit the budget (this reduction would have to occur in the <br />central Efland portion as the STAG funding was earmarked primarily to address the <br />wastewater system for the Buckhorn Community); or <br />2. Apply fora 10-year low interest loan from the State Revolving Loan and Grant Fund <br />(these funds, available at a 4% interest rate would be repaid over a ten year period. The <br />costs (or some portion) of repaying this loan could be included in the sewer rate base <br />over the ten-year loan period; or <br />3. Seek additional funding through the CDBG process (low probability of success) and/or <br />the Rural Communities Assistance Program (moderate probability of success) funding <br />process; or <br />4. Phase system construction by breaking the central Efland portion of the system down into <br />an initial phase or core (pumping station and some portion of the collection lines and later <br />phase(s) or optional components (remaining portions of the collection lines). The County <br />may also structure the bidding process such that the core system represents the base bid <br />and the optional components become add alternates. Should construction bids come in <br />lower than anticipated, more of the add alternates could be included in the construction <br />project. As the design for the full project has been completed, it should be possible to <br />modify the project documents as necessary to break the system down into core and add <br />alternatives and expand the scope of the project to include the add alternatives, should <br />additional funding become available or bids come in lower than expected. <br />5. Utilize some combination of the alternatives outlined above as deemed necessary to <br />maximize the project's final service area while minimizing the financial impact on the <br />Efland system's customers or County taxpayers <br />The BOCC consensus that emerged from its discussion and public comment at opening of the <br />public hearing at its April 1, 2008 meeting appeared to be to fund and construct the entirety of <br />project as it is currently conceived with the budget shortFall financed by a planned debt <br />issuance, potentially supplemented by grant funds should any be found to be available. <br />McGowan Creek Pumping Station Update <br />Another potential cost element that could be added to the sewer expansion project is upgrading <br />the equipment in the existing (as of the original Efland sewer project) McGowan Creek pumping <br />station. According to OWASA's standards for replacing wastewater pumping station related <br />equipment (pumps, motor controls, standby power generators, etc.), the useful lifespan of this <br />equipment is in the 15-20 year range. The equipment at the Efland system's McGowan Creek <br />pumping station will be twenty years old as of this summer.. Replacement of this equipment is <br />scheduled in the Efland Sewer System CIP (system operating permit-required) for FY 2010-11. <br />