Orange County NC Website
0 <br />recommended to the County for inclusion in a 2016 Bond Referendum would be referred to the <br />Task Force for review and prioritization along with other proposed recommendations. <br />Staff has drafted 1) a possible plan for the size and membership of the 2015 Capital Needs <br />Advisory Task Force, and 2) a proposed charge to the proposed Task Force. <br />A suggested composition of the Task Force is: <br />• Two members nominated by the Orange County Schools Board of Education; <br />• Two members nominated by the Chapel Hill - Carrboro City Schools Board of <br />Education; <br />• One member nominated by the Orange County Parks & Recreation Council; <br />• One member nominated by the Commission for the Environment; <br />• One member nominated by the Affordable Housing Advisory Board <br />• One non - elected member nominated by the Partnership to End Homelessness; <br />• One member nominated by the Advisory Board on Aging; and <br />• Six -Eight members appointed at -large by the Board of Commissioners. <br />In addition, the Board of Commissioners may want to consider the appointment of one elected <br />official each from the Town of Chapel Hill, the Town of Carrboro, the Town of Hillsborough, and <br />(possibly) the City of Mebane. <br />The Board of Commissioners will select the Chair (or Co- Chairs) for the Task Force. <br />As part of the Task Force's activities, the Board would direct that the Task Force focus on <br />specific criteria and utilize current policies and documents to guide its work. These parameters <br />for Task Force work are detailed in the proposed charge, which is attached. The Board may <br />wish to add to, or otherwise modify the suggested elements of the charge. <br />Upon approval of the charge and appointment of the Task Force members, the charge would be <br />delivered to the members so that they can begin reviewing the necessary information, applying <br />the criteria, and formulating proposed recommendations to the Board of Commissioners. The <br />Task Force would consider all recommendations and submit a prioritized list to the Board of <br />Commissioners for consideration for bond issue. <br />Staff proposes that the Board of Commissioners discuss and consider approval of the proposed <br />composition and charge for the Task Force. The Board could also provide feedback to staff and <br />staff could subsequently present updated materials for Board approval at the March 3, 2015 <br />regular meeting. Upon approval, the Clerk to the Board would 1) move forward with contacting <br />the groups represented on the Task Force to solicit nominations; and 2) begin advertising for <br />potential appointees to serve in the at large and any other positions established by the Board. <br />All potential nominees /appointees from groups, at large or otherwise would be required to <br />submit an application to the Clerk's Office to be eligible for appointment, with the application <br />period being open for approximately 30 days. <br />Base on the timeframe outlined above, the Board could likely appoint Task Force members at its <br />April 7 and /or April 21, 2015 Board meetings. This would permit the Task Force to hold its initial <br />meeting in May and continue meeting in May, June and through the summer break. Staff's <br />initial proposal is that the Task Force be directed to complete its work and provide its <br />