Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 04-21-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-21-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 8:24:27 AM
Creation date
4/20/2015 9:40:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-21-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Chair McKee thanked him, and he noted that this is why it is important to have outside <br /> 3 appointees to these boards, because the various entities have different regulations. <br /> 4 Thomas Fenske thanked the Orange County Planning Department for having orientation <br /> 5 sessions for him and others. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 • Hillsborough Board of Adiustment <br /> 8 Carl Edward Sain is the Orange County representative on the Hillsborough Board of <br /> 9 Adjustment, and he had no comments. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 • Chapel Hill Library Board of Trustees <br /> 12 James Stroud is the Orange County representative on the Chapel Hill Library Board of <br /> 13 Trustees. He said everything is going well. He said it seems that the only concern he has <br /> 14 heard from the Trustees is about continued financial support from Orange County. <br /> 15 Chair McKee said there is no lack of support for the Chapel Hill Library even as the <br /> 16 Board discusses a southern branch library. <br /> 17 Commissioner Dorosin asked Mr. Stroud if he has heard any discussion of the need for <br /> 18 a more collaborative relationship with regard to the southwest branch. <br /> 19 James Stroud said no. He said the main concern is how that branch will operate and <br /> 20 whether the Chapel Hill Library will keep their funding. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 • Chapel Hill Planning Commission <br /> 23 Deborah Fulghieri is the Orange County ETJ representative on the Chapel Hill Planning <br /> 24 Commission, which used to be the Planning Board. <br /> 25 She said there are fewer seats on the new re-aligned board than before, and Chapel Hill <br /> 26 voted to eliminate the joint planning area (JPA) County seat. She asked the Board of County <br /> 27 Commissioners to keep this seat and the ETJ seat. She said Rogers Road has been voted into <br /> 28 the ETJ area and will have different concerns than the southern ETJ. <br /> 29 She said the southern ETJ contains the Obey Creek development, which was recently <br /> 30 presented to the planning commission. She said the developer plans to put off annexation from <br /> 31 the ETJ into the town of Chapel Hill until July 1st of 2016. She said if the general assembly <br /> 32 votes to eliminate ETJs, this development will fall into the County jurisdiction. She said the <br /> 33 planner in charge of Obey Creek said that as of March 13th they had sent the proposed <br /> 34 development agreement to Orange County. She said a new zoning designation is being <br /> 35 formed, called development agreement 1, which is a placeholder. She is trying to vote against <br /> 36 this as she thinks it sets a bad precedent. <br /> 37 Deborah Fulghieri said 4100-4500 new residences are approved for building in Chapel <br /> 38 Hill, plus another 151 single family homes. She said this has bearing on the school districts and <br /> 39 County services. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Chair McKee said it is very difficult to predict what the legislature may or may not do. <br /> 42 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that the area of the ETJ has increased, but not the seats <br /> 43 on the board. He said the JPA seat is vacant, and he asked if it is going to be eliminated. <br /> 44 Deborah Fulghieri said she does not know if it is going to be eliminated. She said the <br /> 45 planning commission voted to eliminate one of the two seats, either an ETJ or JPA seat. <br /> 46 Commissioner Dorosin said he thinks the number of required seats based on the <br /> 47 population of your relative ETJ is governed by the legislature. He said it may be necessary to <br /> 48 give the ETJ an extra seat, regardless of whether the JPA seat is kept or not. <br /> 49 John Roberts said this is a mathematical calculation based on population. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.