Agenda - 04-07-2015 - 6a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

16 1 Chair Stephen Halkiotis. He said this memo was regarding three issues, including: calendar 2 flexibility; full funding for state allotments, including ADM growth; and full funding for driver 3 education. He said two of these are financial in nature and could have impacts on both 4 districts. He referred to the second item regarding full funding for state allotments, and he said 5 this addresses changes in the last session of the general assembly, whereby growth in school 6 districts has moved from continuation budgets to expansion budgets. He said this means that 7 growth competes with every other item when the general assembly puts together a budget. He 8 said this means absorbing growth, especially rapid growth, may be a challenge. He said this 9 may result in requests for additional county funding to make up that difference. 10 Del Burns said there has been a declining amount of support for driver education as 11 well, and school systems will now be required to provide driver education while having no 12 guarantee of funding to do so. 13 He said the calendar flexibility issue has been brought forth in the face of the recent 14 inclement weather. He said there are August and June cutoff dates that must be adhered to, 15 and the makeup of the lost time ranges from options that are inconvenient, educationally 16 difficult, or negatively impact worship. He said the Orange County Schools would like to offer 17 options that would be family friendly and educationally sound. He said the calendar legislation 18 limits these options. 19 Del Burns said the Board of Education asks for the Board's consideration of these three 20 issues. 21 22 Commissioner Jacobs referred to the following: item #17 *Participation in Solid 23 Waste Programs for Recycling—Authorize counties to require county residents to impose a 24 fee for the solid waste collection services in a manner similar to the authority granted to 25 municipalities. The fee may not exceed the costs of collection. He asked John Roberts how this 26 is different from his interpretation of how the law was changed last August. 27 John Roberts said #17 simply asks that the counties be granted the same authority as 28 the towns. 29 Commissioner Rich asked about Item #3, which is related to broadband service. She 30 asked how the new FCC ruling would affect the wording of this item. 31 John Roberts said he does not know that it would change anything. He said the FCC 32 ruling is tentative, and he expects some legal challenges ahead. He said this item is asking for 33 extra authority, as the County's current authority is limited to providing grants to public internet 34 providers. He said counties, unlike cities, do not have legislative authority to operation 35 communications facilities, so the FCC guidelines are directed toward cities. 36 37 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to 38 close the public hearing and review and discuss the Legislative Issues Work Group's (LIWG) 39 proposed 2015 legislative package and any other potential items for inclusion in Orange 40 County's legislative agenda package for the 2015 North Carolina General Assembly Session. 41 42 VOTE: UNANIMOUS 43 44 Additional item: 45 Commissioner Jacobs said the state legislature is considering a constitutional 46 amendment regarding eminent domain, and one of the drafts was very vague about extending 47 eminent domain to those who provide telecommunication. He suggested the following 48 additional wording: "Oppose adding language to a constitutional amendment on eminent 49 domain that extends any further preemption of county authority to regulate the placement of 50 telecommunication towers."