Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-07-2015 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 04-07-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-07-2015 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 9:33:57 AM
Creation date
4/2/2015 2:47:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/7/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-07-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
ORD-2015-006 Ordinance Amending the Orange County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Ordinance, and Zoning Atlas
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2015
S Statement of Consistency of Proposed Comprehensive Plan, UDO and Zoning Atlas Amendments with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and/or other Adopted County Plans
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
62 <br />Efland Area Resident Group Input /Suggestions for each Proposed Standard is in the Column on the Right <br />Eflaind Village Overlay District <br />Easy <br />Section Number <br />Ref. <br />in UDO <br />Proposed Standard <br />Efland Area Resident Group Input /Suggestion <br />No. <br />Revisions <br />20. <br />4.6.3 (13)(1) <br />In lieu of the front setback required in Article 3, the minimum <br />OK as is <br />front yard setback for properties fronting on U.S. Highway 70 <br />shall be 30 -feet. <br />21. <br />4.6.3 (13)(2) <br />In lieu of the front setback required in Article 3, the front yard <br />OK as is <br />setback for parcels located in the overlay district but not <br />fronting on U.S. Highway 70 shall be in keeping with the front <br />setback provided by adjacent uses. <br />22. <br />4.6.3 (13)(3) <br />The minimum side and rear setback shall be the width of the <br />OK as is <br />required Land Use Buffer (Section 6.8.6) or the setback <br />required in Article 3, whichever is less, but in no case shall be <br />less than 10 -feet. <br />23. <br />4.6.3 (13)(4) <br />Where applicable, the front yard setback shall be measured <br />Delete this requirement. It can be added in the future <br />from any future right -of -way as designated on the Orange <br />if necessary if /when a Comprehensive Transportation <br />County Comprehensive Transportation Plan. <br />Plan that includes future right -of -way designations is <br />adopted. <br />24. <br />4.6.3 (13)(5) <br />Although a portion of the Efland Village Overlay District is <br />OK as is <br />within the Major Transportation Corridor (MTC) Overlay <br />District, the requirements of Section 4.1xA (11.s!Idln,g Setback <br />and Yarn Its quire a "ne nts) the 114T4 do not apply. The parcels are <br />included in the MTC ems} because they fall within the <br />prescribed distance criteria hi-It a„ RAtfRI1 , aRy ;S+;..., <br />the MT-G. I I, ie re (I ulrernents of <br />Section 6.: 12.12(1 t)(9) (off orernise corm "n( I'daI signs l?Irrro I, ill. I! t d) <br />Q;(tlntlinue to alalal.....y.' <br />25. <br />4.6.3 (13)(6) <br />If Building Height Limitation modifications are pursued in <br />OK as is <br />accordance with Section 6.2.2(A), in no case shall building <br />height exceed 40 feet. <br />Z When researching sign requirements, staff discovered the changes shown to the proposed standard are necessary. <br />Page 7 of 17 <br />January 26, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.