Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-07-2015 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 04-07-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-07-2015 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 9:33:57 AM
Creation date
4/2/2015 2:47:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/7/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-07-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
ORD-2015-006 Ordinance Amending the Orange County Comprehensive Plan, Unified Development Ordinance, and Zoning Atlas
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2015
S Statement of Consistency of Proposed Comprehensive Plan, UDO and Zoning Atlas Amendments with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and/or other Adopted County Plans
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />Commissioner Price said she believes another concern about the drive - throughs was the <br />concern of car stacking and all of the associated fumes. <br />Perdita Holtz said that was a concern in the County, but the concern specific to this plan <br />was about the proliferation of fast food restaurants on Highway 70. <br />Commissioner Rich said she remembers this as one of the first things that came before <br />the Board when she came on, and she didn't have a lot of information. She said her concern at <br />that time was calling things urban when there are no sidewalks being put in. She said she still <br />has concerns with calling things urban, when there is no way for people to use their feet to get <br />there, because there are no sidewalks. She is unsure of why the word urban is used in these <br />settings. <br />Perdita Holtz said the growth management systems map adopted in 2003 calls areas <br />rural designated and urban designated, and this is in one of the urban designated areas. <br />Commissioner Rich questioned whether this is really urban. She said the County is just <br />creating an area where people are being allowed to build density. <br />Perdita Holtz said it depends on your definition of urban, but this is creating areas where <br />people can not only build density, but can put non- residential uses. <br />Commissioner Rich said you can't walk there; you have to drive your car there. <br />Perdita Holtz said it is true that you cannot walk there on a sidewalk. <br />Commissioner Pelissier said the difficulty is that this is just a small area compared to an <br />urban area like Chapel Hill or Carrboro. She said, even in Chapel Hill, 15 -501 by -pass is in an <br />urban area, but there are no sidewalks. She said it is difficult because of the scope of what is <br />being looked at. <br />Commissioner Rich said it might just be her getting stuck on the word urban; but when <br />these overlays are done, there are all these districts of overlays that are supposed to be urban, <br />but none of them connect. <br />Perdita Holtz said the small area plan is supportive of having a sidewalk network, but <br />right now, counties in North Carolina have trouble providing, funding, and maintaining <br />sidewalks. She questioned whether you hold this up just because sidewalks can't be provided <br />right now. She asked if development regulation should be kept in place that sometimes requires <br />a buffer of 100 feet, when lots are only 100 feet wide; or if the County should implement <br />something that is good for development now, and the sidewalk issue will continue to be worked <br />on. <br />Commissioner Rich said she understands that, and if the County will be forward thinking <br />and work toward sidewalks, then she is fine with this. She just doesn't want to approve an <br />urban overlay and then that's the end of it. <br />Perdita Holtz said this is just one aspect of implementing the small area plan, and there <br />is still more to do. She said keeping sidewalks and bike lanes in mind is part of the plan, and it <br />is something she thinks Orange County will do when the time is right. <br />Commissioner McKee referred to the statement on creating non - conforming uses. He <br />asked how "operating in the manner in which they are currently operating" will be defined. He <br />said he is aware of multiple parcels of property where new regulations prevent expansion of <br />existing business. He is concerned that this is what will happen here. <br />Perdita Holtz said this would create non - conforming uses if someone wanted to expand <br />their businesses. <br />Commissioner Price asked if there would be a time limit for a non - conforming business if <br />there is a change in ownership and a gap in use. <br />Michael Harvey said there is a time limit of 6 months within any 180 day given period. <br />Greg Andrews said he lives in the Efland Community and he owns a business in the <br />proposed overlay district. He said he is also here in part to represent the Efland Ruritan Club. <br />He proposed a public hearing in the Efland community. He said there are a lot of elderly folks <br />who cannot come sit at this meeting for 3 or 4 hours to get to this part. He said he would like to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.