Orange County NC Website
Article 6: Development Standards 29 <br />Section 6.6: Additional Standards for Overlay Districts <br />.. <br />adopted Efland-4118-b-ARG Small Area PIAR, 27 <br />(b) The need for a connecting roadway between Mount Willing Road and <br />Buckhorn Road, as depicted on the Efland - Buckhorn- Mebane Access <br />Management Plan, adopted November 11, 2011. <br />(3) In order to manage access on public streets, a site shall be permitted no more <br />than one entrance /exit point unless justified by: <br />(a) site configuration; <br />(b) trip generation; <br />(c) aPA-traffic conditions, including the need for separate service and <br />visitor /employee vehicular access, and /or one -way traffic movement; or <br />(d) other factors . 28 <br />(4) Intra -site accessibility shall be provided. Vehicles shall not be required to enter <br />the public street in order to move from one area to another on the same site. <br />(5) On all corner lots, no vehicular openings shall be located closer than 60 feet from <br />the point of intersection of the street right -of -way lines . 29 <br />(6) Driveway a €ntrances /exits shall not exceed 36 feet in width measured at the <br />property line; however, in instances where parking lots serve tractor /trailer traffic, <br />the driveway entrance /exit may be increased to 40 feet in width. <br />(7) Exits for parking facilities containing more than 36 parking spaces shall contain <br />holding lanes for left- turning and right- turning traffic unless the Planning Director <br />determines that due to the physical features of a site, holding lanes would be <br />unsafe and should not be required. <br />(8) Shared Driveways /Access <br />(a) In order to FRaR2g@ aGGG&& minimize the number of driveway curb cuts <br />on Mount Willing Road, thereby improving traffic flow and safety, <br />developments subject to this Section, fronting on Mount Willing Road, <br />and located contiguous to one another shall provide shared <br />driveways /access whenever feasible, as determined during site plan <br />review. <br />(i) <br />ZGnino (`omolionne Dormif Te __e6oAssemeRt agreement sholll be <br />orooer y Cigi ire 6.6.2.A.2- shevogs on example of the shored_ <br />A1°A°T17 . <br />assess- Methods to achieve shared driveways /access may <br />include reciprocal easement agreements among property <br />owners, reservation of future access easements on property <br />27 The Efland Area Resident Group also has suggested that this alignment be removed from the adopted Access <br />Management Plan. (This action is separate from the UDO amendment). <br />28 (3) and (4) are current requirements for properties in EDDs and is good practice for many types of projects. <br />However, it should be noted that NCDOT may not approve more than one entrance /exit point - see (9). The text in <br />orange is to show a reconfiguration of language suggested by the County Attorney's office in late March 2015 in an <br />effort to make the language more clear. The actual language has not been suggested for change. <br />29 (5) through (9) are current requirements of ECOD and are suggested as good practices to be implemented in the <br />Efland Interstate overlay district as well. <br />Orange County, North Carolina — Unified Development Ordinance Page 6 -32 <br />