Orange County NC Website
<br />Memorandum <br />To: Board of County Commissioners <br />From: Commission for the Environment <br />Date: April 21, 2008 <br />Re: City of Burlington Biosolids Permit Renewal Public.Hearing <br />In response to a citizen petition at the March 6 Board of Commissioners meeting, <br />the Commission for the Environment (CFE) has discussed the upcoming Division <br />of Water Quality public hearing for the City of Burlington's biosolids application <br />permit renewal. This hearing appears to now be scheduled for May 13 in <br />Graham. In so doing, the CFE reviewed Health Director Dr. Rosemary Summers <br />March 10 memorandum, and research performed by a CFE member. <br />The CFE feels that a considerable amount of additional information and data is <br />needed to speak knowledgeably about the permit application -and about the <br />ecological and human health issues related to biosolids. However, the <br />Commission would like to forward the following points and ideas for <br />consideration: <br />1. According to our GIS maps of active biosolids application sites, there <br />appear to be a few sites within the critical areas of Orange County's <br />protected watersheds. These include the Burlington application sites <br />within the Cane Creek watershed and active OWASA application sites <br />within the Upper Eno critical watershed Under the County's watershed <br />zoning standards, biosolids application is not permitted within the critical <br />area. We do not know if these particular sites are among those proposed <br />for renewal, or if they are "grandfathered" in, but would suggest any re- <br />permitting by the State exclude these properties now and in the future. <br />2. Based on the publicly available research, the potential environmental and <br />health risks have not been adequately quantified, particularly with regard <br />to organic toxic compounds (such as dioxins, furans and PCB's) and <br />pharmaceutical residues, as these compounds are not subject to <br />regulation. In addition, there appears to be a paucity of current local data <br />both characterizing the compounds present in Burlington's sewage sludge <br />and content of toxic compounds in amended soils -making evaluation of <br />the safety of biosolids application impossible. The CFE proposes that the <br />Health Department and UNC School of Public Health study that is <br />referenced in Dr. Summers' letter be expedited if possible, possibly using <br />County-owned lands, to help address some of these questions. <br />3. As mapped, biosolids application is widespread in the County, with almost <br />3,000 acres of permitted sites receiving biosolids application from six <br />different municipal wastewater treatment facilities including: Durham, <br />Cary, OWASA, Burlington, Mebane, and Hillsborough. . <br />