Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-01-2008-11a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 05-01-2008
>
Agenda - 05-01-2008-11a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 2:50:58 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 10:07:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
11a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080501
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-~n~Form a -Han ~-~-er,~ <br />~., <br />o~~~ <br />,. ~~ 5 <br />~, <br />:luib la~e~~p~ <br />Orange County Animal Services <br />501 W. Franklin St, Suite 106, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 (919) 968-2287 <br />To: Laura Blackmon, County Manager <br />From: Bob Marotto, Animal Services Director <br />Date: April 14, 2008 <br />Subject; Nuisance Ordinance -Animal Noises <br />I want to inform you of a recent decision made by the Animal Services Advisory Board (ASAB) <br />in relation to the Orange County's Animal Control Ordinance (the "Ordinance"). A citizen <br />requested that the ASAB recommend to the Board of Commissioners that it amend the <br />Ordinance to include repeated rooster crowing to the list of noises that currently constitute a <br />public nuisance in Orange County. The relevant section of the Ordinance now provides that a <br />public nuisance exists if, "The animal habitually and repeatedly barks, whines, or howls so as to <br />interfere seriously with the reasonable use and enjoyment by neighboring residents of their <br />property." After a considerable amount of research, the ASAB has decided against <br />recommending that the Ordinance be amended to include noises other than as currently covered <br />by the Ordinance, and I have communicated this to the citizen who made the request. <br />The initial ASAB discussion of the topic occurred in late 2007. Subsequently, staff considered <br />the potential problems that could arise from such an amendment. Based on that process, staff <br />communicated with the ASAB and agreed to conduct additional research on other North <br />Carolina counties with such nuisance regulations. <br />At its March 2008 meeting, the ASAB decided against recommending that the Animal Ordinance <br />be amended to include noises other than those currently listed. That decision was unanimous and <br />based upon different types of information gathered, including the research from other counties in <br />the state. It also included departmental information gathered by staff for all nuisance complaints <br />not related to dogs, of which there were only three in 2007. Staff also confirmed with the <br />County Attorney's office that there is a potential civil remedy available for citizens who believe <br />they are experiencing a nuisance in regards to the use of their property. <br />Should you need more information on this matter, please feel free to contact me. <br />Cc: Gwen Harvey, Assistant County Manager. <br />Ross Oglesbee, Chair, Animal Services Advisory Board <br />Irene Phipps, Animal Control Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.