Orange County NC Website
Commissioner Burroughs said in order for CHCCS to do this, it would have to come <br /> through the budget process. <br /> Commissioner Rich said the CHCCS are an extension of the County, since both school <br /> systems receive almost half of the tax dollars. She said it is a problem to create a policy that is <br /> not being followed by the inside circle. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said the CHCCS have been contracting out more over the <br /> past several years. She said, in order to deal with the remaining employees and look at all of <br /> the contracting that they do, it would be a multi-million dollar budget question. She said it <br /> could be the right thing to ask them to think about this, but it is a large scale discussion. <br /> Commissioner Rich said the schools were asked to provide this information during the <br /> collaboration meeting, and Orange County provided this, but no letter or statement has been <br /> received from CHCCS. <br /> Chair McKee said he will follow up on this. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he has tried to push for doing this on contracts for years. <br /> He said he has asked for follow up on how other jurisdictions deal with these issues. He noted <br /> that no providers of home care for the elderly come close to paying a living wage for that <br /> service. He questioned what the policy would be in a case like this, and he said it is important <br /> to anticipate the difficulties of a potential policy. He said other jurisdictions have already dealt <br /> with these issues and could provide advice. <br /> Chair McKee said he is hearing that the Board would like to see answers for the <br /> questions on page two of their abstract. He said he will follow up with the chair of the Chapel <br /> Hill Board of Education regarding the living wage question. He said his understanding is that <br /> Orange County Schools' movement on the living wage is for its employees, but he is not sure if <br /> this applies to their contract providers. <br /> Chair McKee suggested this item should be scheduled for another work session to <br /> provide time for the answers to be provided. <br /> Greg Wilder said this could possibly be added to the April 9th work session. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked if there have been any conversations with the Sheriff's <br /> department. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said she will follow up on this. <br /> Commissioner porosin asked if this item can be discussed at a regular meeting, as <br /> soon as it can be added. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said staff will bring it back as soon as possible. <br /> Commissioner McKee said this can come back to a regular meeting, and the Board can <br /> decide to vote or not vote at that time. <br /> 2. Discussion of Process for the Public to Place an Item on a Reqular Board Meetinq <br /> Aqenda <br /> Chair McKee said that the Board did not get to this item at the recent retreat, although <br /> there was a discussion of bringing petitions from the Board. He said he heard that if the <br /> petition was an item that had a quick answer, then the manager or staff inember could address <br /> it on the same night. He said if it was a regular petition item or decision item that would require <br /> study, the item would go through standard Chair/Vice-Chair agenda review and then brought <br /> back at a later date. <br /> Commissioner Price clarified that this is not regarding public petitions. <br /> Chair McKee said no. He is just trying to tie up the discussion that was started <br /> regarding petitions by Board members. <br />