Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-2015 - 6c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 03-17-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-17-2015 - 6c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 9:22:02 AM
Creation date
3/13/2015 2:30:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6c
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-17-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P� <br />3. Membership Data <br />Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools ( CHCCS) total decreased from the previous year: 44 <br />students <br />(13) Elementary School <br />3 Middle School <br />(34) High School <br />Orange County Schools (OCS) total decreased from the previous year: 78 students <br />(174) Elementary School <br />15 Middle School <br />81 High School <br />( ) denotes decrease <br />4. Capacity Data <br />Capacity for Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools was increased by 104 students as a result <br />of the opening of the Culbreth Middle School addition. There were no changes to school <br />capacities this year for Orange County Schools. <br />5. Capacity Issues <br />SAPFO vs. DPI <br />The SAPFO is a local ordinance, independent of State Department of Public Instruction <br />(DPI) projections and rules regarding class size. The SAPFO, for instance, does not <br />count temporary modular classrooms as fulfilling the capacity level of service outlined in <br />the SAPFO interlocal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU requires `bricks <br />and mortar' instead of temporary facilities and also requires its own set of future student <br />projections to identify long -term capital school construction needs. However, the County <br />did phase in the smaller class size in previous years that decreased capacity. Decisions <br />will have to be made if new discussions at the state level create any class size changes <br />that should or should not be reflected in the County's SAPFO. <br />This year, CHCCS does not exceed the adopted levels of service established in the <br />SAPFO at this time nor do projections show a potential need at the high school level <br />within the 10 -year planning period. However, projections do show potential needs at the <br />elementary and middle school levels within the later years of the 10 -year planning period. <br />Projected needs are noted below. <br />Additionally, OCS does not exceed the adopted levels of service established in the <br />SAPFO at this time nor do projections show potential needs at the elementary and middle <br />school levels within the 10 -year planning period. However, projections do show a <br />potential need at the high school level within the 10 -year planning period. Projected <br />needs are noted below. <br />6. Student Projection Analysis <br />CHCCS <br />Student membership projections show an increase at all levels within the 10 -year <br />planning period. Projections are shown on page 38 (at the bottom of the page) of the <br />report. <br />OCS <br />Student membership projections show a mix of increases and decreases at all levels <br />within the 10 -year planning period. Projections are shown on page 37 (at the bottom of <br />the page) of the report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.