Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-2015 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 03-17-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-17-2015 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2015 1:56:18 PM
Creation date
3/13/2015 1:56:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-17-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br />1 <br />Commissioner Dorosin said he would be in favor of getting rid of all special <br />2 <br />requirements. He said the Board can take things like geographic diversity or applicant <br />3 <br />backgrounds into account during the nomination process. He said he thinks it makes no sense <br />4 <br />to have vacancies when people have applied to be on the Board. <br />5 <br />Commissioner Rich asked what happens if you find that all of the applicants are from <br />6 <br />Chapel Hill and no other part of the County. She questioned how you could know that future <br />7 <br />Commissioners would not stack committees in their favor. She said if you take away <br />8 <br />requirements, such as geographical location, you could wind up with too many people from one <br />9 <br />area, and then you do not have diversity. She questioned how to make sure each area of the <br />10 <br />County gets to participate in advisory board decisions. <br />11 <br />Commissioner Pelissier asked if this discussion is just about the geographical <br />12 <br />requirementsthat are a choice. She said there are a lot of boards where you have to be <br />13 <br />qualified in a certain way, including some geographical requirements, and some of these are by <br />14 <br />state statute. <br />15 <br />Chair McKee said his reading is that this discussion is about geographical requirements <br />16 <br />only. <br />17 <br />Commissioner Dorosin said he would be in favor of getting rid of any of these <br />18 <br />requirements that are not statutory. <br />19 <br />Chair McKee said he is not sure that all of the specific types are statutorily required, but <br />20 <br />they might be necessary. <br />21 <br />Commissioner Rich asked which boards are having a problem. <br />22 <br />Chair McKee said the Housing Authorityboard has had difficulty with achieving quorum. <br />23 <br />Commissioner Rich said she is trying to figure out the boards with a geographical <br />24 <br />requirement. <br />25 <br />Chair McKee said this includes Animal Services, and Agricultural Preservation. <br />26 <br />Commissioner Jacobs said the Commission for the Environment has very specific <br />27 <br />limitations. <br />28 <br />Commissioner Pelissier said these are notgeographical limitations. She said if it is <br />29 <br />focused on geographical, the primary board is the Planning Board. She thinks it is very <br />30 <br />important for the Planning Board to have people from different parts of the County. She said <br />31 <br />these people have very different experiences to offer. <br />32 <br />Commissioner Pelissier said, thinking about non-geographical requirements, it is <br />33 <br />important for a board such as the Commission for the Environment to have people who know <br />34 <br />about different aspects of the environment. She wants to see that diversity. She said there has <br />35 <br />been not much of a problem, and she does not want to see a change because of a few glitches. <br />36 <br />She does not think this helps with moving forward. <br />37 <br />Commissioner Price saidthere have been problems with geographicissues on the <br />38 <br />Planning Board. She said her spot on this board has changed continuously as a result of this. <br />39 <br />She said she agrees with Commissioner Dorosin that flexibility is needed, but she also agrees <br />40 <br />with Commissioner Rich that there needs to be balance. <br />41 <br />Commissioner Price said the other issue is that some people are just not interested <br />42 <br />because they feel it is a waste of time. She said many boards and commissions meet in the <br />43 <br />evening, which can be difficult for people. She said there have been people on the OUTBoard <br />44 <br />who have had to leave. She said people have also questioned whether the Commissioners pay <br />45 <br />attention to what comes out of these advisory board meetings. <br />46 <br />Commissioner Jacobs saidhe came into this thinking of the fact that the places with the <br />47 <br />longest unfilled vacancies are the ones that are designated to the towns, who never bother to fill <br />48 <br />them. He said the towns do not care, and he would like to create a mechanism that if atown <br />49 <br />vacancyis not filled within 6 months, it is up for “grabs”. He said efforts can still be made to find <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.