Browse
Search
Minutes 06-05-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 06-05-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:30:43 AM
Creation date
3/4/2015 8:09:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/5/2014
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-05-2014 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Attachment A
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Attachment B
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Attachment C
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Attachment D
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 06-05-2014 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
billing only that 60 percent. <br /> Commissioner McKee said yes, he is asking about imposing a fee only on the people <br /> who are currently receiving the service. <br /> Michael Talbert said it would be more than the fee was two years ago, but it is hard to <br /> specify. He said those people would have the option of not paying the fee or having the <br /> service. He said a broad guess would be $75. <br /> Commissioner McKee said this would take them back to a subscription fee. He asked if <br /> it would be possible to impose this fee and have it billed out in July before the tax bills go out. <br /> Michael Talbert said no. He said that window has passed, and a supplemental bill <br /> would have to be mailed out in September or October. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked, if it was not on a volunteer basis so people could <br /> withdraw, whether it would then have the same problems as the previous 3-R fee. <br /> Michael Talbert said yes. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said she is not comfortable putting a decision item on a work <br /> session. She asked about putting this item on the consent agenda on June 17tn <br /> Chair Jacobs said that could be done, but there would still be a decision tonight that <br /> shows intent by putting it as a consent agenda item. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said the Board would only be showing intent. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he agreed with Commissioner Pelissier. He does not have <br /> a problem with expressing intent tonight, but he would prefer to put this on the June 17tn <br /> agenda. <br /> Commissioner Price arrived at 7:18 p.m. <br /> Commissioner porosin said he does not see a problem with voting for it now, although <br /> he appreciates the concern. He does not think that a consent item provides any more <br /> transparency. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said she wishes the Board had adopted a formula for providing <br /> rural curbside recycling in April. She said considering the fairness of the situation, they should <br /> o fund both rural and urban services. She said the message that needs to be sent to the <br /> towns is that the County wants to be their partners. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she is in favor of voting for this tonight. She understands the <br /> transparency issue, and the intent is nice. She said this discussion should have happened last <br /> time, and she feels it is time to correct the Board's earlier decision. She said it is important to <br /> be in better communication with the towns and to make an equitable decision. <br /> Commissioner Price said she assumed at the last decision point that the Chair and Vice <br /> Chair had already considered this. She said the Board needs to move forward, and she would <br /> be ready tonight to vote. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he believes the Chair had mentioned this issue previously, <br /> and this is why that option was brought in. <br /> Chair Jacobs said there is a gap in communication between the entities that is no one's <br /> fault. <br /> Commissioner Rich said it is important to understand that if the Board goes with option <br /> 2, the towns need to be included in the discussion about how to replenish the solid waste <br /> reserves. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said it is clear that the Board will act tonight, and she will <br /> probably vote in favor of this as a way to show her support for the towns; however she does <br /> want to express her discomfort of doing this action at a work session as a precedent. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.