Browse
Search
Minutes 05-29-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 05-29-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:28:51 AM
Creation date
3/4/2015 8:07:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/29/2014
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-29-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-29-2014 - Budget Public Hearing
Agenda - 05-29-2014 - addition
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-29-2014 - Budget Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We are counting on you to fully fund the Orange County and Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools <br /> budget. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Sara Skinner, MPH <br /> 2407 Pathway Dr. <br /> Chapel Hill, NC 27516 <br /> 919 929-2565 <br /> Hello Commissioner Jacobs! <br /> How are you? <br /> Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend either of the Public Hearings on the county budgets so <br /> am writing to submit questions and give input. <br /> Overall, I am not in favor of a tax increase this year for many reasons, including the impact on <br /> affordability for low income/workforce residents and county/town ability to retain and attract <br /> businesses. <br /> In general, I do not mind paying more in taxes than other areas of the state but believe that the <br /> quality and level of service should reflect the extra monies spent. At this point, data suggests <br /> that we pay some of the highest costs in the state for many of our services - school, solid waste <br /> and emergency response services to name a few. This information, suggests the need for re- <br /> assessment and revised planning instead of an increase in taxes to continue on. <br /> Below are my initial questions and comments: <br /> School Funding: <br /> Question: What projects or repairs make up the $40,000,000 in the capital budget for schools <br /> over the next five years? Does that cover repairs that are needed immediately? <br /> Request 1: Establish a policy which mandates on-going repair and maintenance of school <br /> facilities as a top-priority each year, making sure that monies are earmarked for those costs. <br /> Request 2: Fund necessary school repairs immediately either by postponing non-essential <br /> capital items or using existing debt capacity (or both). <br /> Request 3: Ensure, each year, that our teachers are being well-paid, as a priority, by <br /> earmarking monies for those costs. <br /> I was pleased to see that staff has indicated concern about the squeeze that increasing <br /> maintenance for aging buildings puts on the school budget. Aging buildings and teacher exodus <br /> are two symptoms which underscore the need for the county to make changes to the way that <br /> school funding is handled — both at the county and district level. <br /> In targeting a minimum of 48% of county property taxes to the schools, the county has assured <br /> its residents that schools are a top priority however, as county staff points out, the impacts of <br /> changing conditions such as increased maintenance needs for aging buildings or decreases in <br /> state funding for teacher pay, put squeezes on those monies. <br /> Adherence to the 48% target combined with the yearly "dance" between the school boards and <br /> commissioners over funding clouds the picture —making it hard for parents, in particular, to <br /> advocate for anything other than a tax increase. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.