Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-03-2015-13 (5)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2015
>
Agenda - 03-03-2015 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 03-03-2015-13 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 9:03:28 AM
Creation date
2/27/2015 1:45:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/3/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
13-5
Document Relationships
Minutes 03-03-2015
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K <br />However, it should be noted that the County contracted with a consultant last year to <br />study student generation rates in newer housing types (defined as constructed within <br />the past 10 years) and the preliminary results of the study is showing higher student <br />generation rates in newer MF housing (0.20 student per multi - family unit). <br />At these preliminary rates, 161 students would be expected from 806 multi - family units. <br />Project specific MF that have been built have shown a wide array of student impacts <br />from extremely low (i.e. 1 or 2 students per 100 units) to as high as single family at <br />approximately 73 students per 100. This variation is related to number of bedrooms, <br />location and how and who the developer markets the project. <br />Transportation Improvements Proposed <br />The application materials included information on proposed transportation <br />improvements: <br />• Widening Eubanks Road in both directions <br />• Installing two new 4 -way traffic signals on Eubanks Road <br />• Adding additional turn lanes to each leg of the existing traffic signal at the <br />Eubanks <br />Road /MLK intersection <br />Modifications to both the ingress and egress routes from the park- and -ride lot <br />and BRT program. <br />Orange County Transportation Staff Comments <br />The North -South corridor should be shared by multiple transit agencies, including <br />Orange Public Transit (420 Route), Triangle Transit, and Chapel Hill Transit (Interlining). <br />The location of a northern terminus park and ride lot for connection to any future BRT in <br />the MLK corridor should be considered during the review of the EDGE <br />development. Keeping the proximity of the existing park and ride lot (downsized or <br />structural) would facilitate 2 strong retail opportunities: one, allow commuters to shop <br />nearby before return to exurbia and two, allow students from campus and MLK areas to <br />shop and use retail and restaurants creating transit demand nodes at both north and <br />south ends promoting efficiency. <br />Stormwater <br />The project is located in the Jordan Lake Unprotected Watershed and the Town of <br />Chapel Hill enforces its stormwater regulations within its municipal limits. However, <br />County staff may suggest increasing mitigation of stormwater impacts. While the <br />development will be required to preserve stream buffers and install best - management <br />type post - development stormwater management facilities, primarily for peak flow <br />attenuation and nutrient export reduction, the County would be interested inassisting in <br />one or more of the following: <br />1. Upgrading the proposed stormwater management facilities to a higher level of <br />nutrient reduction, such as including bio- retention or stormwater wetlands, with <br />the goal of reaching or beating export limits recognized by Orange County (2.2 <br />pounds per acre nitrogen & 0.82 pounds per acre phosphorus), without <br />compensatory mitigation. <br />2. Evaluating a portion of the adjacent property for an off -site regional stormwater <br />management facility that would have a net neutral or positive impact on water <br />quality, when contrasted with existing conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.